Category talk:Fly-in portraits - Revision history

Iritscen: +cat

2022-05-04T02:50:25Z

+cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 4 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)		Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)
	:I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --[[User:Iritscen\|Iritscen]] 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST)		:I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --[[User:Iritscen\|Iritscen]] 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST)

			[[Category:Oni game images]]

Iritscen: Iritscen moved page Category talk:Fly-ins to Category talk:Fly-in portraits without leaving a redirect: Missed Talk page when Category page was "moved".

2015-08-13T15:20:54Z

Iritscen moved page Category talk:Fly-ins to Category talk:Fly-in portraits without leaving a redirect: Missed Talk page when Category page was "moved".

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:20, 13 August 2015
(No difference)

Iritscen: if you can somehow justify this, I will heed your words, but I need more convincing

2008-10-07T15:48:37Z

if you can somehow justify this, I will heed your words, but I need more convincing

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 7 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Rather ~~tan~~ categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)		Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)
			:I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --[[User:Iritscen\|Iritscen]] 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST)

Geyser: advice

2008-10-07T02:30:41Z

advice

New page

Rather tan categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)