98
edits
Talk:Daodan DLL: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
RossyMiles (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
RossyMiles (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
According to SFeLi, GCC doesn't support fastcalls and Pelles-C does. He said, however, that we could stick to MinGW and emulate fastcalls with libraries written in ASM. I honestly am not familiar with the problem or the workaround, so I can't give a clear answer. Let's hope SFeLi is not dead, so he can comment on that when he's back. In the meantime, of course, just stick with MinGW, and keep those updates coming ;) | According to SFeLi, GCC doesn't support fastcalls and Pelles-C does. He said, however, that we could stick to MinGW and emulate fastcalls with libraries written in ASM. I honestly am not familiar with the problem or the workaround, so I can't give a clear answer. Let's hope SFeLi is not dead, so he can comment on that when he's back. In the meantime, of course, just stick with MinGW, and keep those updates coming ;) | ||
:[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 14:54, 9 November 2008 (CET) | :[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 14:54, 9 November 2008 (CET) | ||
GCC supports fastcall, if it didn't then none of my code would work, however if there's a good reason to Pelles-C then I'm ok with it. As for updates, when the school certificate's over, maybe. | GCC supports fastcall, if it didn't then none of my code would work, however if there's a good reason to use Pelles-C then I'm ok with it. As for updates, when the school certificate's over, maybe. | ||
:[[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 07:06, 10 November 2008 (CET) | :[[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 07:06, 10 November 2008 (CET) | ||