Oni2 talk:Grand Unified Theory: Difference between revisions

From OniGalore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Iritscen moved page Talk:Grand Unified Theory to Oni2 talk:Grand Unified Theory without leaving a redirect)
m (Story graph)
Line 23: Line 23:
You guys don't let me move pages around without leaving redirects. So don't wait for me to do that :P --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 10:53, 23 May 2020 (CEST)
You guys don't let me move pages around without leaving redirects. So don't wait for me to do that :P --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 10:53, 23 May 2020 (CEST)
:1) Redirects can always be cleaned up, and are not an issue at all for "young" pages that are not in public view yet. 2) If you like one of the suggested names, tell me which. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 11:20, 23 May 2020 (CEST)
:1) Redirects can always be cleaned up, and are not an issue at all for "young" pages that are not in public view yet. 2) If you like one of the suggested names, tell me which. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 11:20, 23 May 2020 (CEST)
==Story graph==
[[Oni2_talk:Truth_Number_Zero/Course_Of_Events|Discussion is fine ...]] but at some point it would be nice to have a graphical representation of entities and their connections, not unlike that Wasteland Flowers graph but with color coding to easily identify ideas of different authors. So that no "wall of text" emerge, potentially slowing things down. SoW, TNZ, CB all have growing pages and GUT will be probably no different.
For a story that includes years of fictional life of many characters I think text bubbles might make it easier to remember or look up certain parts. '''"Why was this necessary? What ambiguity (alternative routes) does this give us?"''' The individual parts should be of "plug-in" character.
The downside is the editing of such graph/map, not to mention collaboration. In the end this might remain wishful thinking? [[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 22:12, 9 June 2020 (CEST)

Revision as of 20:12, 9 June 2020

Naming

GUT to emphasize the challenge of this undertaking.
Alternative names might be TNZ+ or 0+.
Ultimately, the naming is totally unimportant right now. It is just to have something for chats. --'Dox
I welcome the initiative, but I feel like I am in the middle of an active discussion over at TNZ, and I also feel like I need to translate the French version back to English, to refamiliarize myself with the 2017 iteration, and maybe go through ASFO2 chronicles one more time. So it is a bit early for me to start contributing regularly and "well-informed"ly to this page. --geyser (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2020 (CEST)


Working title proposals

You can vote here for other names :P --'Dox
It's canon/fanon we're talking about. So, if everything goes well, it will just be "Oni". Fingers crossed. --geyser (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2020 (CEST)
If I had to suggest a catchy working title, I'd probably go with "Iron/iOn Club" or "Club of Iron/iOn" (in reference to the "Oni ni kanabô" saying). Or "Rashômon" (the Oni-Guarded Gate). --geyser (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2020 (CEST)


Calling the new Oni (extended past, present and future) just Oni actually sounds more appealing than complicated stuff like Iron/iOn Club. But "Oni" is better suited for the final thing. --paradox-01 (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2020 (CEST)

The "Club" thing has a double meaning (blunt weapon and group of people sharing a common interest).
If this doesn't work, then previously I described my approach to storytelling as "annealing": "raising the temperature" through brainstorming and debate, and then cooling down into a consolidated/hardened state - with improved strength and purity, but with all the new ingredients mixed in. We are basically using "iron" (iOɴ) to create an elaborate "alloy".
At one point I described the Daodan as a "mender and catalyst" (fixing what's broken, and empowering new change). Mender And Catalyst abbreviates to MAC, so I expect it would be popular with our Mac friends. ^_^
More simply, the search for a consensus can be described with the words "eye to eye". To "see eye to eye" with someone is to agree on interpretations or values. We are not in that state of agreement yet, but we are looking for it, so "Eye to Eye" looks like an appropriate description of our goal - whether we'll actually reach it or "die trying".
"I see you." (c) Avatar
P.S. I'd move it to the Oni2 namespace, something like Oni2:Eye_to_Eye --geyser (talk) 13:48, 22 May 2020 (CEST)

You guys don't let me move pages around without leaving redirects. So don't wait for me to do that :P --paradox-01 (talk) 10:53, 23 May 2020 (CEST)

1) Redirects can always be cleaned up, and are not an issue at all for "young" pages that are not in public view yet. 2) If you like one of the suggested names, tell me which. --geyser (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2020 (CEST)


Story graph

Discussion is fine ... but at some point it would be nice to have a graphical representation of entities and their connections, not unlike that Wasteland Flowers graph but with color coding to easily identify ideas of different authors. So that no "wall of text" emerge, potentially slowing things down. SoW, TNZ, CB all have growing pages and GUT will be probably no different.

For a story that includes years of fictional life of many characters I think text bubbles might make it easier to remember or look up certain parts. "Why was this necessary? What ambiguity (alternative routes) does this give us?" The individual parts should be of "plug-in" character.

The downside is the editing of such graph/map, not to mention collaboration. In the end this might remain wishful thinking? paradox-01 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2020 (CEST)