Category talk:Articles that need deletion: Difference between revisions

Category talk:Articles that need deletion (view source)

Revision as of 18:22, 13 March 2008

1,319 bytes added , 13 March 2008

no edit summary

Iritscen

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

18,700

edits

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 :::::::I can't see why the alternative to regular updates is an outright deletion. And really, it's not so much worse than the "finished" PKV pictures ^_^
 ::::::::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 04:37, 13 March 2008 (CET)
+:::::::::"Categories are not really a hierarchy. They are much more flexible than "Images" and don't call for a strict "structure" or for exhaustive coverage..."
+::::::::::Wikipedia editors would not agree with that statement. Have you seen how obsessively everything is categorized? I once followed a page on a Norwegian hockey team out through like 15 levels of categories until I got to the rarefied air at the top of Wikipedia's category tree, where the most basic elements of the universe are used as category names. But I don't necessarily advocate that approach.
+:::::::::"I can't see why the alternative to regular updates is an outright deletion."
+::::::::::Because it's not done. I'm self-conscious enough about my work already without having half-finished bits get uploaded (not that I blame whoever did it, they don't know about my quirks and foibles). The only reason I was even uploading a weekly, incomplete version of any of that work to my Photobucket album was to demonstrate that weekly progress was being made. Otherwise people would think nothing was going on, like so many abandoned pages on the Web, and stop checking back (assuming anyone was checking to begin with, which is maybe too big an assumption, but a guy's gotta dream, right?). --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 19:22, 13 March 2008 (CET)