8,464
edits
Restless Souls/Technology: Difference between revisions
m
SLD applications
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) (3D printing) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (SLD applications) |
||
| Line 1,322: | Line 1,322: | ||
However, the abilities claimed in the manual could be requirements for the SLD brain/mind to work normally because it requires some body functions. | However, the abilities claimed in the manual could be requirements for the SLD brain/mind to work normally because it requires some body functions. | ||
Their food could be raw material for regeneration, and a compound of hydrogen and oxygen may be needed to transform chemical energy to electric current. Their sweat then could be pure water from the chemical reaction from inside the fuel cell. | Their food could be raw material for regeneration, and a compound of hydrogen and oxygen may be needed to transform chemical energy to electric current. Their sweat then could be pure water from the chemical reaction from inside the fuel cell. | ||
====Final applications==== | |||
: SLD technology has reached it's third design generation and prototype SLDs are in use in a wide range of industries including law enforcement, fire fighting, manufacturing, and aviation. | |||
After these public tests WCG decided to ban some applications in sale and manufacturing. | |||
Thought experiment: Factory owners try to rationalize. They replace "human resources" with robots. At the end you have a factory full of robots that are owned by the factory. And repairs of robots are carried out by other robots. In that scenario the capitalism would itself rationalize to death. Therefore SLDs should only be given tasks that are extreme dangerous or not "system threatening". Think of jobs that only few wants to carry out or where androids are a more reasonable choice: nursing, activities at atomic/biologic/chemical dangerous sites, decontamination, miners, safeguard jobs, soldiers, astronauts. | |||
The WCG is trying to reform education and job market towards more ''creative'' directions. But that endeavor doesn't proceed as quickly as it would be necessary. | |||
'''Project Checkerboard''' | |||
To minimize effects of organized crimes and terror attacks, the WCG founded the checkerboard project. | |||
The chessboard serves as analogy whereas the it stands for the battle ground and black and white figures for destructive and counter-distructive forces. | |||
The androids lay dormant until an incidence occurs. They can counteract in an instant and reduce death tolls. | |||
Another decentral application would be medial emergency SLDs. This civil application could easily increase public acceptance of SLD usage. | |||
| Line 1,331: | Line 1,352: | ||
Pensatore must have realized AIs don't simply pop into existence even with sufficient enough hardware wired together. He must have guided AVATARA virtual development. That's why other scientist call him father of the SLDs. | Pensatore must have realized AIs don't simply pop into existence even with sufficient enough hardware wired together. He must have guided AVATARA virtual development. That's why other scientist call him father of the SLDs. | ||
<!-- | |||
Taken 'out' for editing. | |||
===Naming and marketing=== | ===Naming and marketing=== | ||
Why naming it "Simulated Life Doll"? | Why naming it "Simulated Life Doll"? | ||
| Line 1,344: | Line 1,366: | ||
Maybe the "doll" part can be still justified with economic arguments. The academic staff at WCG has probably foreseen the impacts SLD have if they were to replace too many human workers because of optimizations in companies and the acceleration of such by competition. AI and SLD research have promising benefits but they would ruin capitalistic systems by making a lot of persons "redundant". The sex industry wouldn't had to do much persuading presenting themselves as bakers and not system threatening. So, naming the robots "dolls" might be long-term lobbying for fueling acceptance of these "products". Well, that still sounds ridiculous and might not be worth mentioning in a serious manner. It's more like a joke about where economic and political interests can sometimes result in. | Maybe the "doll" part can be still justified with economic arguments. The academic staff at WCG has probably foreseen the impacts SLD have if they were to replace too many human workers because of optimizations in companies and the acceleration of such by competition. AI and SLD research have promising benefits but they would ruin capitalistic systems by making a lot of persons "redundant". The sex industry wouldn't had to do much persuading presenting themselves as bakers and not system threatening. So, naming the robots "dolls" might be long-term lobbying for fueling acceptance of these "products". Well, that still sounds ridiculous and might not be worth mentioning in a serious manner. It's more like a joke about where economic and political interests can sometimes result in. | ||
--> | |||
===Mukade, the SLD=== | ===Mukade, the SLD=== | ||