Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions

The fat years are over and again wrong priorities are about to get chosen. (Please don't.) If it rains nukes on Germany - and when that happens on whole Europe - forget [https://www.rbb24.de/politik/beitrag/2022/04/bunker-schutz-umbau-garagen-u-bahn-sicherheit-gruene-ukraine.html underground stations] and [https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen-anhalt/zivilschutz-katastrophenschutz-notfallplaene-bunker-100.html bomb shelters], placebos. After the explosions, there will be still nuclear fallout and starvation. Politicians should be so honest to say there is no real escape. Instead of preparing for an severe but unlikely threat - that can be barely mitigated - so that it basically brings nothing but costs, that the money should be better used to tackle much realer problems: for instance, the energy transition (Energiewende), the underdeveloped digital infrastructure, cyber security, teaching companies directly to use new tools, and pushing the GAIA-X project so that it does not become a total billion-euros grave. -- Again: There is not one single plausible scenario that would justify the construction of new protection structures. Bomb shelters make sense in isolated wars but not for Germany which is part of NATO. A full scale conventional war against Germany would automatically get nuclear. And then you are in so much deep shit that nothing will help.