User talk:Guido/Wishlist/Part 4: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:once again, a well done scene.
:once again, a well done scene.
::[[User;AF|AF]]
::[[User;AF|AF]]
Imagine you are spending a few weeks in an endless desolation, wearing the same dress, under adverse weather conditions, no water (only something to drink), concrete heart to fall asleep onto- Let us consider how one can be after a day running like a mad on a bicycle under the rain, or a whole day climbing a rocky mountain. :)
Imagine you are spending a few weeks in an endless desolation, wearing the same dress, under adverse weather conditions, no water (only something to drink), concrete heart to fall asleep onto- Let us consider how one can be after a day running like a mad on a bicycle under the rain, or a whole day climbing a rocky mountain. Then let's try to wonder how one can seem after several days spent like this.
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
:I too have trouble imagining Konoko ("dead drunk"?) making an ass of herself.
:I too have trouble imagining Konoko ("dead drunk"?) making an ass of herself.
Line 11: Line 11:
:*why in the world would she allow herself to attain such a state? What happened?
:*why in the world would she allow herself to attain such a state? What happened?
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 07:02, 16 October 2006 (CEST)
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 07:02, 16 October 2006 (CEST)
who said she is actually drunken? Don't take Kazuo's impressions for a fact. Konoko is not drunken, if you want my point of view as a narrator- not every line is a trustful description of a situation. In particular dialogues lines are interpretations.  
who said she is actually drunken? Don't take Kazuo's impressions for a fact. Konoko is not drunken, if you want my point of view as a narrator- not every line is a trustful description of a situation: consider this line as the distorted interpretation of a character.  
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
----
----
Line 20: Line 20:
:Still can't proofread right now, sorry.
:Still can't proofread right now, sorry.
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 07:02, 16 October 2006 (CEST)
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 07:02, 16 October 2006 (CEST)
Mrs Hishikawa is no problem. We can adjust this detail.
There is no problem with Mrs Hishikawa. We can adjust this minor detail as you say Geyser.
Instead the infamous line, makes me some trouble. We can replace it as well. Basically imagine an effective substitute, where we understand the  reason what the expedition is, why Mrs Hishikawa seems so unsimpathetic. Consider this line is following a small hiatus. The narration avoids the core of the conversation and we see only the end of it: Kazuo has become more confident with his special guess, and become more chatty.
Instead the infamous line, makes me some trouble. We can replace it as well, but I find personally difficult to find somethng in alternative. Basically imagine an effective phrase that let us understand the  reason of the expedition (something like the initiative of  an aid association), and the why Mrs Hishikawa seems so unsimpathetic. Consider this line is following a small hiatus. The narration avoids the core of the conversation and we see only the end of it: Kazuo has become more confident with his special guest, as we notice he is getting more and more chatty.
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
::[[User:Guido|Guido]] 21:29, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
212

edits