Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1,742: Line 1,742:
* [[wp:de:Sigmar_Gabriel|Sigmar Gabriel]]: "In the past, the middle-class master craftsman felt just as at home with us as the skilled worker, the carer or the police officer. Today we increasingly lack the social spectrum of a people's party. In parliament we are largely fully academic. [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/sigmar-gabriel-ueber-die-spd-der-politische-schaden-ist-eingetreten-110128391.html As a result, we have lost touch with the everyday lives of many people in Germany.]"
* [[wp:de:Sigmar_Gabriel|Sigmar Gabriel]]: "In the past, the middle-class master craftsman felt just as at home with us as the skilled worker, the carer or the police officer. Today we increasingly lack the social spectrum of a people's party. In parliament we are largely fully academic. [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/bundestagswahl/sigmar-gabriel-ueber-die-spd-der-politische-schaden-ist-eingetreten-110128391.html As a result, we have lost touch with the everyday lives of many people in Germany.]"


In the meantime, they were not able to acquire any significant new groups of voters in terms of volume. -- But this is the curse of all parties in successfully and democratically managed national economies. At some point, the big issues are so polished that further optimizations entail debates that become more and more complex and thus more incomprehensible and ''boring''. (See also: [[#The optimization trap|The optimization trap]]). Last but not least: In the face of multiple crises neoliberal<!--😈-->-acting Scholz was unable to push his government in time to substantially improve the situation around migration, integration, housing construction, industrialization, (de)bureaucracy and digitization. To rise the overall mood the Ampel gov tried to communicate that they have realized many other promises. You could say this is technically true but people don't really care because it doesn't change the fact that these projects aren't on '''their''' priority list.
In the meantime, they were not able to acquire any significant new groups of voters in terms of volume. -- But this is the curse of all parties in successfully and democratically managed national economies. At some point, the big issues are so polished that further optimizations entail debates that become more and more complex and thus more incomprehensible and ''boring''. (See also: [[#The optimization trap|The optimization trap]]). Last but not least: In the face of multiple crises neoliberal<!--😈-->-acting Scholz was unable to push his government in time to substantially improve the situation around migration, integration, housing construction, industrialization, (de)bureaucracy and digitization. To rise the overall mood the Ampel gov tried to communicate that they have realized many other promises. You could say this is technically true but people don't really care because it doesn't change the fact that these projects aren't on '''their''' priority list. Also: When German hate one thing, then it is fighting parties. (And it was even worse: There was a total blockage.)


======Party: Die Linke======
======Party: Die Linke======
8,013

edits