826
edits
(can't respond with that picture in the way) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
::iterate doesn't really work, so I'm not suprised. :) Not sure about the riddle_counter thing. Does it still break when you use else if? BSL is goofy. :) [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 10:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | ::iterate doesn't really work, so I'm not suprised. :) Not sure about the riddle_counter thing. Does it still break when you use else if? BSL is goofy. :) [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 10:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Did you actually notice what paradox is doing here? riddle_counter is tracking how many times iterate works. So asking if riddle_counter works on its own is kinda silly ;-) Anyway, how sure are we that this is how iterate was meant to be used? I mean, it looks like you're setting an iterator to a function pointer or something, which is sort of weird for any language. Wouldn't iterate have been intended for use with arrays? It seems like all those deprecated keywords -- every, for, iterate, over, repeat, and using -- were meant for arrays. Now if only we knew how to make an array! --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | :::Did you actually notice what paradox is doing here? riddle_counter is tracking how many times iterate works. So asking if riddle_counter works on its own is kinda silly ;-) Anyway, how sure are we that this is how iterate was meant to be used? I mean, it looks like you're setting an iterator to a function pointer or something, which is sort of weird for any language. Wouldn't iterate have been intended for use with arrays? It seems like all those deprecated keywords -- every, for, iterate, over, repeat, and using -- were meant for arrays. Now if only we knew how to make an array! --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::O_o You are right. Two things to check: See what somethingX is at the end. Try setting SomethingX to a value first. [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 00:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
edits