Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions

Talk:Restless Souls/Summary (view source)

Revision as of 20:33, 17 September 2022

544 bytes added , 17 September 2022

m

no edit summary

Paradox-01

8,452

edits

@@ Line 714: / Line 714: @@
 Germany and Israel: what units them in this war is both their dishonorable lack of support for Ukraine. While others fight for their lives, these two patting each others shoulder for remembering the long past dead, as if nothing else is more important than cultivating Germany's eternal guilt and the Jews eternal victim cultism. "Wake up" you might want to shout at them. You shouldn't look away when massive murdering is happening. Germany and Israel should know better than anybody else you might think. Don't let it become a dead ritual you might think. Should we really burden ourselves with another historic guilt by not helping enough? -- I'm sick the "hollow" remembering. Stand the colors meant to be protected or put the remembering up your you-know-where.
-Addendum:
+Addendum: Time for a bit recapitulation.
 * Early worries that qualify as '''red lines''' where the "no-fly zone" and sending NATO troops. '''In quintessence everything that could lead to WW3.''' Somebody said to not constantly talk about nuclear escalation to not make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. So this might explain why Scholz avoided to mention it again and thought of other excuses. This self-chosen non-communication left behind a confused German population. It just happened that 2022.09.17 Biden and Scholz could longer hold back to mention it again.
-* "Sleepwalking into WW3" were also mentioned in the past. In Scholz logic weapon deliveries would equal as such. The distinction of defensive and offensive weapons is a really poor one, so this reveals itself as another pretextual argument.
+* "Sleepwalking into WW3" was also mentioned in the past. In Scholz logic weapon deliveries would equal as such. The distinction of defensive and offensive weapons is a really poor one, so this reveals itself as another pretextual argument. Putin decides what is too much "offensive".
-* It was often said "we" don't let us blackmail by Putin. This is nonsense. Of cause Putin successfully blackmails us with nuclear escalation otherwise the points above wouldn't exist.
+* It was often said we don't let us blackmail by Putin. This is nonsense. Of cause Putin successfully blackmails us with nuclear escalation otherwise the points above wouldn't exist.
-* Conclusion: Scholz must be thinking there is [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/haubitze-rch155-ukraine-bekommt-bessere-deutsche-artillerie-18323559.html no other option left but to wait]<!-- delivery in 2025--> until Putin runs out of ammunition or troops. The proverbial bite into granite.
+* Frustrating Conclusion: Scholz must be thinking there is [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/haubitze-rch155-ukraine-bekommt-bessere-deutsche-artillerie-18323559.html no other option left but to wait]<!-- delivery in 2025--> until Putin runs out of ammunition or troops. The proverbial bite into granite. The weak point is: When Putin runs out of conventional ammunition he will still have the nuclear bombs. Therefore Scholz' plan might be after all to not give Ukraine enough weapons so they cannot take back Crimea. In that scenario neither Ukraine wouldn't have lost "older" territory nor would have Russia its "newer". Back to status quo. There we have it again, as Scholz said: "Ukraine must not lose." (At the beginning he avoided to say "Ukraine has to win.")
 ====5-Grad-Plus-Erde====