8,013
edits
Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (→Liberals) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1,691: | Line 1,691: | ||
Liberal parties have a serious strategic problem: '''By achieving their objectives, they hollow out themselves - faster than any other party.''' Genuine liberalism is characterized by the struggle for personal liberties and civil rights. These freedoms are usually won once and then exist for a long time without further action. Fighting for additional freedoms or expanding existing freedoms is becoming increasingly difficult to practically impossible. '''As consequence''', these parties are shrinking and tend to take up '''substitute objectives'''. '''Constitutional liberal objectives keep flaring up, but they only have a niche existence next to economic liberalism.''' The economy is strongly patriarchal (male-dominated), so that feminists and left-wing identities (themes of sex and gender, diversity, rights for minorities, wokeness) have increasingly been taken up by the Greens and the Left. | Liberal parties have a serious strategic problem: '''By achieving their objectives, they hollow out themselves - faster than any other party.''' Genuine liberalism is characterized by the struggle for personal liberties and civil rights. These freedoms are usually won once and then exist for a long time without further action. Fighting for additional freedoms or expanding existing freedoms is becoming increasingly difficult to practically impossible. '''As consequence''', these parties are shrinking and tend to take up '''substitute objectives'''. '''Constitutional liberal objectives keep flaring up, but they only have a niche existence next to economic liberalism.''' The economy is strongly patriarchal (male-dominated), so that feminists and left-wing identities (themes of sex and gender, diversity, rights for minorities, wokeness) have increasingly been taken up by the Greens and the Left. | ||
This disregard and the economically liberal focus repeatedly brings the liberals close to the 5% hurdle and makes them vulnerable to lobbying and ''mercenarism''. Sometimes one favors the other. -- Against large donations the industry and economy expect a radical market economy policy or a policy that is exactly tailored to the respective donor. In part, this can have a reactionary, an anti-progressive and a paradoxical effect: new technologies are prevented in order to protect existing business models and prevent the dynamics of a free market. In this way, anti-liberal policies is done by the liberals themselves. -- Free thinking and acting of the liberals [https://archive.is/fW7lc is increasingly hindered by lobbyists]. | This disregard and the economically liberal focus repeatedly brings the liberals close to the 5% hurdle and makes them vulnerable to lobbying and ''mercenarism''. Sometimes one favors the other. -- Against large donations the industry and economy expect a radical market economy policy or a policy that is exactly tailored to the respective donor. In part, this can have a reactionary, an anti-progressive and a paradoxical effect: new technologies are prevented in order to protect existing business models and prevent the dynamics of a free market. In this way, anti-liberal policies is done by the liberals themselves. -- Free thinking and acting of the liberals [https://archive.is/fW7lc is increasingly hindered by lobbyists]. -- "Technology openness" was in German a camouflaging term for blockage policy to protect old business models. At the same time the automobile industry had also ignored the signs of time in China. | ||
'''Liberal vs. libertär''' | '''Liberal vs. libertär''' | ||
| Line 1,697: | Line 1,697: | ||
Geht man nach der [[wp:de:Libertarismus#Geschichte|Historie]] ist liberal eher links gerichtet: Nach Schrumpfung des Bürgerrechts-Liberalismus bedeutet liberal in Deutschland überwiegend wirtschaftsliberal zu sein, was letztendlich im rechten (konservativen) Spektrum verortet wird. Im Allgemeinem wird libertär auch als radikalere Form von liberal verwendet, insbesondere im Kontext des Anarchokapitalismus. Der Begriff ultraliberal konnte sich noch nicht durchsetzen. Er hat eine [[wp:de:Ultraliberalismus|ambivalente Bedeutung]]. | Geht man nach der [[wp:de:Libertarismus#Geschichte|Historie]] ist liberal eher links gerichtet: Nach Schrumpfung des Bürgerrechts-Liberalismus bedeutet liberal in Deutschland überwiegend wirtschaftsliberal zu sein, was letztendlich im rechten (konservativen) Spektrum verortet wird. Im Allgemeinem wird libertär auch als radikalere Form von liberal verwendet, insbesondere im Kontext des Anarchokapitalismus. Der Begriff ultraliberal konnte sich noch nicht durchsetzen. Er hat eine [[wp:de:Ultraliberalismus|ambivalente Bedeutung]]. | ||
Siehe auch: [[wp:de:Liberalismus|Liberalismus]] (tendenzielle Schwerpunktsetzung Freiheit) vs. [[wp:de:Libertarismus|Libertarismus]] ( | Siehe auch: [[wp:de:Liberalismus|Liberalismus]] (tendenzielle Schwerpunktsetzung Freiheit) vs. [[wp:de:Libertarismus|Libertarismus]] (tendenzielle Schwerpunktsetzung Materielles: Wirtschaft und Eigentum) | ||
Liberalismus und Libertarismus streben beide weniger Einfluss durch den Staat an, wobei ersterer eher ein [[wp:de:Minarchismus|Minimalstaat]] möchte und letzterer ein Nullstaat. | Liberalismus und Libertarismus streben beide weniger Einfluss durch den Staat an, wobei ersterer eher ein [[wp:de:Minarchismus|Minimalstaat]] möchte und letzterer ein Nullstaat. | ||