826
edits
User talk:Iritscen: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
:This function would be triggered by members of heal_mechanics01 (they have writen it in their CHAR file, under "hurt" trigger). When called, it takes name of the CHAR as a parameter and then waits until this CHAR's HP drops around 1/2 (value is set maually in the script). Then it calles hypo using FILM for this CHAR. | :This function would be triggered by members of heal_mechanics01 (they have writen it in their CHAR file, under "hurt" trigger). When called, it takes name of the CHAR as a parameter and then waits until this CHAR's HP drops around 1/2 (value is set maually in the script). Then it calles hypo using FILM for this CHAR. | ||
: Nice, isn't it? --[[User:Loser|Loser]] 18:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | : Nice, isn't it? --[[User:Loser|Loser]] 18:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, thats about what I meant. :) [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 08:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ::Yeah, thats about what I meant. :) Either method requires changing files though, because AFAIK AI aren't given hypos in the CHAR. [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 08:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Hey. When Gumby is on it, there's another worthy thing to try. Duplicating chr_poison (ai_name, damage, interval, initial_interval) and replacing the health reducing function by a health adding function. Then that could be used instead of chr_playback_block. It would not only simulate "AI Hypos" but better AI and player regeneration than chr_set_health. Smooth health increment (for player) can be done in a looped BSL function. 20:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | Hey. When Gumby is on it, there's another worthy thing to try. Duplicating chr_poison (ai_name, damage, interval, initial_interval) and replacing the health reducing function by a health adding function. Then that could be used instead of chr_playback_block. It would not only simulate "AI Hypos" but better AI and player regeneration than chr_set_health. Smooth health increment (for player) can be done in a looped BSL function. 20:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Done that already, in ReOni. The problem lies in the fact that there isn't an easy way AFAIK to copy a function using the Daodan. The other problem is that Macs would be left out cold. [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 08:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | :Done that already, in ReOni. The problem lies in the fact that there isn't an easy way AFAIK to copy a function using the Daodan. The other problem is that Macs would be left out cold. [[User:Gumby|Gumby]] 08:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | ||