8,446
edits
BSL talk:Manual: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(heh, I guess I kinda knew the answer already) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
:Okay, that must be a limitation of the function stack in BSL. If you put "fork BSL_chaos", it goes all the way to six. I had already tried "fork BSL_chaos" in the previous code, but it doesn't accept the keyword "fork" in that context. I guess I should have said something earlier, but I assumed for some reason that the execution stack was bigger than that, so I figured it was "iterate" that was limiting us somehow. Well, congrats on figuring out a way to use "iterate", although I still think it was meant for arrays. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 23:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | :Okay, that must be a limitation of the function stack in BSL. If you put "fork BSL_chaos", it goes all the way to six. I had already tried "fork BSL_chaos" in the previous code, but it doesn't accept the keyword "fork" in that context. I guess I should have said something earlier, but I assumed for some reason that the execution stack was bigger than that, so I figured it was "iterate" that was limiting us somehow. Well, congrats on figuring out a way to use "iterate", although I still think it was meant for arrays. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 23:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Ah ok, always fork... But I don't think we can use iterate already. "something2 = BSL_chaos; iterate over something2 using somethingX" didn't produce error messages but how can we set iterate variable to numbers? Using "var int somethingX = 3" failed. :| --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 10:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||