Talk:Oni engine patches (Mac PPC)/changelog: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(env_ray_number) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). [[User:Neo|Neo]] | Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). [[User:Neo|Neo]] | ||
:Neo, geyser asked me to test env_ray_number and to see if the call back was setup in the Mac engine [[User:EdT|EdT]] | |||
Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. [[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST) | Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. [[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST) | ||
I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. [[User:Neo|Neo]] | I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. [[User:Neo|Neo]] | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 22 October 2008
"at 0x16E834 Replaced chr_focus with chr_health"
Why would you do that? Chr_focus is very useful. Gumby 10:24, 20 October 2008 (CEST)
When it comes to replacing functions, you have to consider the length of the name and signature string. chr_health had a longer signature string "chr_index:int [hit_points:int | ]" than chr_focus "chr_index:int" So it will easier to find another function to replace chr_focus with the shorter signature string. EdT
Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). Neo
- Neo, geyser asked me to test env_ray_number and to see if the call back was setup in the Mac engine EdT
Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. rossy 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST)
I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. Neo