Wilderness Preserve: Difference between revisions

From OniGalore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
m (Typos, rephrasing, minor additions.)
Line 26: Line 26:
[[Hasegawa]]'s [[Daodan]] can be seen as an extreme (and desperate) way to reunite [[Man]] with [[Nature]] : indeed, the Daodan fundamentally endows humans with the atrophied faculty to ''adapt''.
[[Hasegawa]]'s [[Daodan]] can be seen as an extreme (and desperate) way to reunite [[Man]] with [[Nature]] : indeed, the Daodan fundamentally endows humans with the atrophied faculty to ''adapt''.


There's a bit of a parallel with Nausicaä's promotion of harmony between Mankind and Nature : however, the harmony brought about by the Daodan is somewhat more creepy (see the entry about [[Daodan#Smart cancer|"smart cancer"]] and following) than the fairy-tale-like Nausicaä.
There's a bit of a parallel with Nausicaä's promotion of harmony between Mankind and Nature : however, the harmony brought about by the Daodan is somewhat more creepy (see the entry about [[Daodan#Smart cancer|"smart cancer"]] and following) than Miyazaki's fairy-tale-like message.


Nausicaä and [[Konoko]] have a lot in common (innocent, caring and altruistic by nature, endowed with symbiotic "superpowers", excellence in acrobatics and combat, strong sense of initiative, headstrong quest for the truth, equally headstrong support of a sort of symbiosis between Mankind and the toxic environment it generated).
Nausicaä and [[Konoko]] have a lot in common :
*innocent, caring and altruistic by nature
*endowed with symbiotic "superpowers"
*excelling in acrobatics and combat
*sporting a strong sense of initiative
*headstrong in
**their quest for the truth
**support of a sort of symbiosis between Mankind and the toxic environment it generated
*...


However, Oni's Daodan has a quite non-trivial biotechnological background, the details of which Konoko is disturbingly happy to overlook (as compared to Nausicaä, who experiments on toxins, and figures out the dual, regenerating role of the contaminated areas).
However, Oni's Daodan has a quite non-trivial biotechnological background, the details of which Konoko is disturbingly happy to overlook (as compared to Nausicaä, who experiments on toxins, and figures out the dual, regenerating role of the contaminated areas).


Put short, Konoko's actions (or [[Hasegawa]]'s, for that matter) are consistent with the radically pessimistic assumption that the contaminated areas are ''here to stay'', and will only grow larger, and the best thing humans can do is to give is to become ''part of the overall contamination'' : the environmental damage is deemed irreversible. Miyazaki's Nausicaä is infinitely more optimistic and constructive.
Konoko's actions (or [[Hasegawa]]'s, for that matter) are consistent with the ''radically pessimistic'' assumption that the contaminated areas are ''here to stay'' and will only grow larger. Taken on its own that statement is the same as that of warrior princess Kushana, and most humans in Nausicaä's world.


"Mankind as we knew it is doomed. The Chrysalis will change us all. Let's hope it's for the better."... The message is close to that of Myazaki's story, where Nausicaä is the "spokesman" of the contaminated forest... ''except'' Nausicaä never means to be assimilated/alienated by the toxic environment : she points out a way for everything to go ''back to normal''.
But when it comes to the ''alternative to a Man/Nature struggle'', it's very different in both tales. For Konoko/Hasegawa, the best thing humans can do is ''become part of the overall contamination'' : since the environmental damage is deemed irreversible, that's the only kind of harmony that can be achieved.
Miyazaki's Nausicaä is infinitely more optimistic and constructive.
 
"Mankind as we knew it is doomed. The Chrysalis will change us all. Let's hope it's for the better."... Konoko's (Hasegawa's) message is close to that of Myazaki's story, where Nausicaä is the "spokesman" of the contaminated forest... ''except'' Nausicaä never means to be assimilated/alienated by the toxic environment : she points out a way for everything to go ''back to normal''.


So, basically, Oni features a darker version of Nausicaä's dilemma : much more pessimistic about awareness and redemption.
So, basically, Oni features a darker version of Nausicaä's dilemma : much more pessimistic about awareness and redemption.
Since such a radical posit is necessarily somewhat trivial, there's much room/need for exploration and complexification.
Since such a radical posit is necessarily somewhat trivial, there's much room/need for exploration and complexification.
Could it be that Hasegawa and his daughter are overdramatizing/overlooking things?


To be continued...
To be continued...
Line 44: Line 56:
----
----
----
----
==Related==
==Related==
*[[BioCrisis]]
*[[BioCrisis]]
*[[ACC]]
*[[ACC]]
*[[Cataclysm]]
*[[Cataclysm]]

Revision as of 09:30, 4 September 2006

I'm not sure yet about where this will go : maybe it's best merged with BioCrisis.

The Nausicaä parallel is so rich already, it definitely deserves a page of its own.

I'll be detailing it and splitting it up : consider this as an "Oni/Nausicaä" sandbox for now.


Wilderness Preserve

Fateful trespassing

The tale of the Hasegawas' excursion into the Wilderness Preserve goes here.

Flyover warning

Airport terminal goes here




Added value

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind

Just as in Miyazaki's Nausicaä, wildlife has become toxic, and spreads outwards from highly contaminated zones, threatening the human population.

Mankind is responsible for the poisoning in the first place, but now faces extinction for the following reason : while nature assimilates the poison and adapts to it, the human being has a history of shielding himself from his living medium.

The human logic is to not adapt physiologically, and alter the environment instead. In other words, Man has long substituted technological evolution to the biological one. That poses a problem when the environment changes are particularly violent : Man's unwilingness to adapt physiologically is paired with an inability to do so, in the event of e.g. a major environmental crisis.

Hasegawa's Daodan can be seen as an extreme (and desperate) way to reunite Man with Nature : indeed, the Daodan fundamentally endows humans with the atrophied faculty to adapt.

There's a bit of a parallel with Nausicaä's promotion of harmony between Mankind and Nature : however, the harmony brought about by the Daodan is somewhat more creepy (see the entry about "smart cancer" and following) than Miyazaki's fairy-tale-like message.

Nausicaä and Konoko have a lot in common :

  • innocent, caring and altruistic by nature
  • endowed with symbiotic "superpowers"
  • excelling in acrobatics and combat
  • sporting a strong sense of initiative
  • headstrong in
    • their quest for the truth
    • support of a sort of symbiosis between Mankind and the toxic environment it generated
  • ...

However, Oni's Daodan has a quite non-trivial biotechnological background, the details of which Konoko is disturbingly happy to overlook (as compared to Nausicaä, who experiments on toxins, and figures out the dual, regenerating role of the contaminated areas).

Konoko's actions (or Hasegawa's, for that matter) are consistent with the radically pessimistic assumption that the contaminated areas are here to stay and will only grow larger. Taken on its own that statement is the same as that of warrior princess Kushana, and most humans in Nausicaä's world.

But when it comes to the alternative to a Man/Nature struggle, it's very different in both tales. For Konoko/Hasegawa, the best thing humans can do is become part of the overall contamination : since the environmental damage is deemed irreversible, that's the only kind of harmony that can be achieved. Miyazaki's Nausicaä is infinitely more optimistic and constructive.

"Mankind as we knew it is doomed. The Chrysalis will change us all. Let's hope it's for the better."... Konoko's (Hasegawa's) message is close to that of Myazaki's story, where Nausicaä is the "spokesman" of the contaminated forest... except Nausicaä never means to be assimilated/alienated by the toxic environment : she points out a way for everything to go back to normal.

So, basically, Oni features a darker version of Nausicaä's dilemma : much more pessimistic about awareness and redemption. Since such a radical posit is necessarily somewhat trivial, there's much room/need for exploration and complexification. Could it be that Hasegawa and his daughter are overdramatizing/overlooking things?

To be continued...




Related