Category talk:Fan art: Difference between revisions
(having my say) |
m (link fix) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=On my choices for inclusion in the "Fan art" category= | =On my choices for inclusion in the "Fan art" category= | ||
I know that the uploading of certain fan art (mostly by me) was controversial because of the (lack of) quality of some of it (or in one case, the erotic posedness of it, even though that was clearly a joke). What I've categorized here as Fan Art, I stand by and would defend these images against deletion. The rest, meh, I wouldn't miss 'em. But what I've included in this category are serious attempts at drawing Konoko. Are all of them accurate? Well, there's certainly some stylistic re-interpretations, but even the in-game art is inconsistent, so I don't see a problem with art that re-imagines Konoko's appearance as long as it doesn't do so accidentally (because it's drawn sloppily). Not all of this art is executed by professional-level artists, and I think that's okay. I say that there's room for artists here who still have room for improvement. Heck, murinex's | I know that the uploading of certain fan art (mostly by me) was controversial because of the (lack of) quality of some of it (or in one case, the erotic posedness of it, even though that was clearly a joke). What I've categorized here as Fan Art, I stand by and would defend these images against deletion. The rest, meh, I wouldn't miss 'em. But what I've included in this category are serious attempts at drawing Konoko. Are all of them accurate? Well, there's certainly some stylistic re-interpretations, but even the in-game art is inconsistent, so I don't see a problem with art that re-imagines Konoko's appearance as long as it doesn't do so accidentally (because it's drawn sloppily). Not all of this art is executed by professional-level artists, and I think that's okay. I say that there's room for artists here who still have room for improvement. Heck, murinex's chibi faces are quite crude, and they're here already. So, maybe my opinions don't count here, but I just wanted to get that off my chest. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 19:41, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 7 March 2013
On my choices for inclusion in the "Fan art" category
I know that the uploading of certain fan art (mostly by me) was controversial because of the (lack of) quality of some of it (or in one case, the erotic posedness of it, even though that was clearly a joke). What I've categorized here as Fan Art, I stand by and would defend these images against deletion. The rest, meh, I wouldn't miss 'em. But what I've included in this category are serious attempts at drawing Konoko. Are all of them accurate? Well, there's certainly some stylistic re-interpretations, but even the in-game art is inconsistent, so I don't see a problem with art that re-imagines Konoko's appearance as long as it doesn't do so accidentally (because it's drawn sloppily). Not all of this art is executed by professional-level artists, and I think that's okay. I say that there's room for artists here who still have room for improvement. Heck, murinex's chibi faces are quite crude, and they're here already. So, maybe my opinions don't count here, but I just wanted to get that off my chest. --Iritscen 19:41, 19 March 2008 (CET)