BSL talk:Tutorial/airport1 level logic.bsl: Difference between revisions

BSL talk:Tutorial/airport1 level logic.bsl (view source)

6 bytes added , 17 April 2012

m

link fix

19,800

edits

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 19:32, 21 March 2008 (CET)
 :::Well, I wasn't going to say it, but I happen to think blurbs of ASCII interrupted by awkward redundant section headers in another font is uglier. I don't see solid ASCII as ugly in the first place. Also, we could use the style of commenting you use [[Quotes/Consoles/level_1e|here]], which would make comments stand out more against the monospaced font.
-:::Also, it wouldn't be more work to use my method, once it's implemented. You just enclose every function name with <nowiki>{{Anchor|functionname}}</nowiki> and then, in theory, put a template like {{AnchorTOC}} at the top and it will list the anchors.
+:::Also, it wouldn't be more work to use my method, once it's implemented. You just enclose every function name with <nowiki>{{Anchor|functionname}}</nowiki> and then, in theory, put a template like [[Template:Anchor]] at the top and it will list the anchors.
 :::But, what is it exactly that you don't like about the way the ASCII text looks? The monospacing? I mean, weren't you doing exactly this when you linked [[IGMD/Airport#Original_contents|here]] to those text files? Weren't the "overcommented" versions just going to be the ASCII versions with comments in them? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 20:19, 21 March 2008 (CET)