Review criticisms
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="width:
| “ | I've been trying to think of what we really can do at this point to truly improve Oni. IE: If Oni was rated a 7 in some gaming magazine, [how] we['d raise] it to an 8. | „ |
| —Gumby |
||
The above thought really put things into perspective for me. Right now, our main focus for the AE is adding BGI. That's a good idea, because it was originally part of the game before cuts were made... but overall, the approach to the AE has been one of adding new content, instead of stepping back and asking what made the Oni of 2001 get the middling scores that it did. Loving what we love about the game, it can be hard to see the game objectively. We usually come up with ideas that make Oni more complex or that tweak it minorly, but rarely are we able to get to the heart of what prevented Oni from getting the highest marks. So I decided to poll the reviews that Oni was given, and use their words. It's not that we aren't capable of criticizing Oni... but it is harder for us than it is for them; they're paid to criticize!
Following are some quotes that I thought offered "food for thought". I haven't bothered to attribute them; I'm not writing a research paper here; besides, I want us to focus on what was said, not who said it. All quotes come from either reviews listed on the Reviews page, or from the list that Metacritic used to determine Oni's average score of 7.3/10. You might find it difficult to read this all at once, as it's a lot of criticism for our beloved game. I suggest you take it in doses or you will get bitter or overwhelmed, and possibly mad at me for collecting all these critical quotes ^_^;
This page is titled rather informally because I want it to be viewed as only that, "food for thought", not as some task or burden that someone has to deal with; these are just things to talk about, nothing more :-). You may feel that some of the criticisms made here can't be fixed without tons of work or the source code for the game. That may be the case, but I felt it was important to be thorough, not to filter my findings for "practicality". Other things listed here you may not think to be a problem at all. If enough people feel that way, we can strike the item off the page, but I wanted to put as many critical points out there as I could find (minus a few comments that were just totally out of touch with what Oni is supposed to be). I've also left out what might be complaint #1 -- "no multiplayer" -- since that is already being worked on, and the dead horse needn't be beaten any more than it already has over the last seven years.
Long-term, my hope is that this page may provide a vision that goes beyond the current approach we're taking to the AE. After all, if we can actually, gradually, improve on the elements of Oni that non-dedicated fans thought were lacking, that gives us the best chance of bringing new people into the fandom and demonstrating to those who have rights to Oni what the game's potential is.
Finally, keeping in mind a certain complaint made about the last brainstorming page I made, I don't think there is such a thing as "too many ideas", or that making suggestions takes focus away from other work. True, reading through these quotes and talking about them takes time, but far less time than actually working on them. The idea here is to offer notions for future work. But anyone who's signed up for the AE Team is working on what they are assigned to/volunteered for, from a set list of tasks. So the ones who shouldn't be distracted by this won't be. The most important phase of any project is the part where ideas are generated, and the best are selected out of the rest, and worked on. Without all possible ideas on the table, we can't make the best use of our time and energy. Okay, enough rambling, on with the quotes! -- User:Iritscen">
Story
| “ | The strange thing is that her character still remains a very empty one. Most of her interactions with the game's other characters are extremely understated and reveal little about what people want to know about her. Part of this appears to be an effort to create a bigger mystery around what Konoko exactly is. | „ |
Before anyone speaks up in defense of the way things are, let me just throw one word out there: Casey. Someone we were already kinda considering adding (back) into the story. Perhaps a side story with him might allow us to flesh out Konoko's human side a little more. It's a tricky thing to contemplate, but I don't think that it shouldn't be brought up just because it's tricky. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
- I can't comment on this much. Adding in BGI without screwing up the story is tricky enough as it is. Gumby
Gameplay
Game Design
| “ | Using stealth, you can sneak up on guards but I found this feature was far too underused. | „ |
Of course, this feature is only as "underused" as the player underuses it, but the point I took away from this was that it is rarely useful/smart to use stealth. It's too easy to be spotted with the way the enemy walks and turns around from time to time, and the benefit seems pretty negligible to taking someone out stealthily, so I think that's why we don't take the time to sneak around more often. It seems to me that fixing this might require moving some obstacles around in levels, and editing patrol paths, and possibly finding some way to make stealth a rewarding approach that can be used in place of charging in every time. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | That's not to say that Oni doesn't boast an impressive level here and there, such as an intense airport mission, but the overall scheme is disappointing. Most of the levels feature locked doors that are opened using computer terminals to bypass security. Later in the game, the pattern changes to having to use multiple computer terminals to open a locked door. | „ |
Another reviewer coins a term for this: "samey". He laments that a game with so much action could feel repetitive. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | There’s some promise shown early on with disabling the Deadly Brain even though it’s a modified jumping puzzle but it’s not found anywhere else. More innovation would have been welcomed. | „ |
Well, the Deadly Brain "puzzle" is found one more time... but I don't think that invalidates the point he/she is making. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | [...] the building structures may be nice, but aside from a few of your standard "jump" obstacles there is very little to actually interact with. | „ |
| “ | Despite the wonderfully crafted training tutorial stage for players to get accustomed to the complex controls, the minute the actual in-game mission started, I still found myself ill-prepared and dying and restarting quite frequently. | „ |
| “ | The only thing I didn't like was the lack of a section in the training camp where one could actually spar with foes outside the game. A lot of the best moves just happen, but an experienced user can pull off miraculous combinations. Presently, there's no safe place to practice these, and I hope Bungie provides one. | „ |
There's nothing wrong with a learning curve, of course. But wouldn't we all, as newbies, have welcomed a return to the training level, to practice moves that you had newly obtained? This is more practical, story-wise, if the room is indeed in virtual space, as there is some indication. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Though the game is linear, there's more than one way to achieve an objective. Honestly, that's half the fun, plotting plan B, C, D, etc. after plan A falls flat on its face. | „ |
This statement actually feels overly generous to me. Are there really multiple paths to each goal? Certainly in some places, but I don't feel that Oni is consistent in this; surely with such large levels, we can find some way to make things a bit more non-linear? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Allied characters are few and far between, and also very stupid; at no point do you really feel as part of a 'team' in a coordinated attack. This is a shame, as it could have been a real boost to gameplay at some points. | „ |
This sounds like, not a criticism of the AI's general intelligence, but of the fact that in situations like the attack on TCTF HQ, your allies can't even follow you to other floors. This seems like a scripting flaw to me, not an AI2 problem. Also, look at gmsly's approach to using teams (see 1:40 and 1:50) and tell me that's not exactly what the reviewer would have loved to see. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
Technical Stuff
| “ | There's no way to re-configure the controls, at least not without editing a non-documented file. | „ |
I know we have third-party tools for doing this, and the startup dialog box (that's currently broken for both OS X and Windows), but doesn't it seem like there should be some way to make this part of the interface? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Oni automatically saves your game at certain points of a mission, but there's no way to save your progress whenever you want to. | „ |
It seems that since the level scripting is based around the current, fixed savepoints, we can't just give the player the ability to save anytime, anywhere. We can add more savepoints, though, which is sort of on the long-term To-Do list already. Any other ideas on this subject? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | There are frequent points in the game where Konoko's survival depends on how quickly she can flee. Say you just defeated an opponent strapped with C4 hooked to a three-second timer. As he's dropping, he activates the self-destruct. You'd think Konoko would want to get out of there in a hurry. But instead of adding a single "dash" button to the controls to speed up Konoko's default run, it is a double-tap forward affair which, in the most inopportune times, can result in some kind of sluggish ambling followed by a speedy death. | „ |
I know we are going to turn off Konoko's auto-dash hack in future AE releases, right? I do feel that's a good idea, but it will also reintroduce the above problem. So, what about a "dash" key? Is that possible? A separate key from the normal run key, or else using a modifier in conjunction with that key? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | The game itself exhibits many “clipping” problems in which characters can pass through walls, hang off ledges and pass through solid objects in such a way that one is jarringly reminded that you are playing a computer game. It is very common to enter a room, look back and find the foot or head of your just-vanquished foe sticking through the wall or protruding through the closed door; in several places in the game you can even fight an opponent through the closed door they are guarding, while being totally immune to gunfire. | „ |
| “ | I’ve heard several arguments from fans of the game and Oni team members that keeping a constant distance between the POV and Konoko is essential for aiming range weapons and timing your attacks, and to a certain extent I buy this logic – if, that is, I had never played Rune or FAKK2. | „ |
This is sure to be a controversial point, as I think most of us are fine with the JelloCam, but I've put it here anyway for discussion, not because I necessarily agree with it. I need to go back and play Rune and FAKK2 before I form an opinion, myself (can't remember how the cameras worked). --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Violating one of the ten commandments of game design, Bungie for some reason decided to not include the option of skipping cutscenes. We wouldn't have had a problem if we were forced to watch a cutscene the first time, but, thanks to the autosave issue, you may be forced to watch the same cut scene over and over again. | „ |
We already have a solution to this, courtesy of Gumby, although it is not yet part of the AE. This quote can be considered a reminder that it should be, though. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
Gun Combat
| “ | Weapons mysteriously disappear as time passes if left on the ground. | „ |
Gumby tells me this is easily fixed. Are there any downsides, in terms of either technical issues or gameplay issues, to letting the weapons hang around all the time? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | [...] you can't put the largest cannons in down in your shorts just as you can with smaller weapons. | „ |
I can only imagine the reviewer was thinking of the WMC when he wrote this. Of course, all other weapons can be holstered. But maybe this reviewer should be right. I know we've already discussed making rifles unholsterable; so what's the current feeling on making that change in the AE? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | The enemies have some killer aim, and can get off many more shots before the player is able to get a few well-aimed shots off. This is of course resolved by closing distance with the enemy but in my experience it is just as safe to dodge weapon based attacks by dashing towards the enemy. Other equipment like the force field belt, and an overdose of hypos provide the extra boost to accomplish this sort of thing without taking a scratch. | „ |
I think this is a very valid point about a flaw in the gameplay's balance. To this end, Gumby has experimented with the AI's accuracy setting, which inexplicably is set to 1 (basically, "god-like") in the ONCCs even though a wide range of accuracy is possible. We've found that a setting of 3 (that right, Gumby?) seems to give the AI realistic human-like accuracy. Anyone else have any thoughts on this subject? And let's get that movie up here, Gumby, where you adjust the skill setting in realtime. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | [...] the Mercury Bow, a scopeless pseudo-sniper rifle | „ |
"Scopeless", eh? Well, now, I believe we might be able to do something about that ;-) --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
Melee Combat
| “ | The lack of a good off-the-floor attack in Konoko’s moves vocabulary is a surprising omission, considering how often she gets knocked down. | „ |
Graphics & Sound
Animation
| “ | When you send an enemy down to the ground, they tend to drop as if they've suffered a concussion. They don't squirm at all, they just lay there for a few seconds and then they pop back to their feet, ready for round two. | „ |
I think the reviewer was seeing the combination of (a) some unusually long "idle times" (or "nap times", as I call them) for some characters such as Tankers, and (b) the fact that fallen animations are actually kind of weak -- characters just kind of gently float to the ground sometimes, and immediately stop moving when touching said ground, which is not how it works in real life -- and (c) as the reviewer says, the enemies don't move from the time they fall to the time they get up. Honestly, I don't see a problem with (c) as long as (a) and (b) can be addressed. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | If you throw someone while they are near a wall or a railing, they magically float down to the floor rather than smash against the wall or topple over the edge. | „ |
Graphics
| “ | In puzzling fashion, the dialogue is presented using close-up portraits of the characters that are speaking. The lack of animation in these cut-scenes is quite distracting and really takes away from the overall experience of the game. | „ |
Under "Graphics" and not "Animation" because by "animation" I think the reviewer wants facial expressions to change, or at least for the mouths on the characters to move, and this can be accomplished by animated textures more easily than 3D animation... which is not to say that it's necessarily practical to do with texture animation either... thoughts? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Bungie has managed to create situations that are absolutely devoid of dramatic camera angles and detailed settings, and the mission scripting is pretty skimpy too. Story sequences are restricted to real-time cut scenes involving poorly animated character models conversing with out of place portraits representing each character's voice at the top of the screen. | „ |
A lack of "dramatic camera angles" probably refers to the fact that there are few close-ups in the cutscenes; this is probably due to the non-animated faces, which Bungie wanted to avoid drawing attention to. See above quote. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | The levels are very large at times too, but not always terribly well designed, with some rather shoddy texture work in areas. Japanese minimalism may be popular, but untextured areas don't really achieve this! | „ |
| “ | [...] a general emptiness of detail which would leave even a Bauhaus architect screaming for a potted plant or a water cooler to break up the monotony. | „ |
| “ | The levels look decent but aren't particularly memorable (with the exception of the eerie dream level). There are a lot of futuristic offices and complexes, but not many are particularly distinct. | „ |
Could be considered a game design issue rather than a graphics issue... or not an issue at all, since Oni takes place in realistic settings, thus one should not expect fantastical levels (dream level aside). In what ways could we make the offices and such more distinct, or are they distinct enough already? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Originally slated for release in the fourth quarter of 1999, the textures seem kind of bland and boring by today's standards. Even a year ago the graphics of Oni would be considered a bit outdated when compared to the likes of Quake III: Arena and Unreal Tournament. 32-bit color depth is supported, but Oni doesn't appear to take full advantage of the increased color palette. | „ |
This *is* true, isn't it, about Oni not being in 32-bit color? --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)
| “ | Apparently, in the future, there is a company with a monopoly on the security terminal market, because all throughout the game, you will come across the same exact terminal several dozen times per level, the only thing differentiating the terminals is an abstract shape displayed on the monitor. | „ |
Sound
| “ | Footsteps [...] sound identical regardless of who makes them or where they come from. | „ |
Actually, there are different sounds for different floor materials, right? Even if so, this point is still partially valid. --iritscen 04:36, 9 December 2008 (CET)