18,700
edits
m (→What are the Daodan Chrysalises, really?: phrasing) |
|||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:'''Plant''' | :'''Plant''' | ||
::Pros: Plants are easier to deal with, from a story-telling perspective, than animals or bacteria. They're simpler than animals in terms of lifestyle, and they exist in a single body, so they can't spread in an untidy manner like bacteria or viruses. | ::Pros: Plants are easier to deal with, from a story-telling perspective, than animals or bacteria. They're simpler than animals in terms of lifestyle, and they exist in a single body, so they can't spread in an untidy manner like bacteria or viruses. | ||
::Cons: It's hard to picture the great Daodan organism living outside a host as a mere potted plant. | ::Cons: If the Daodan were a plant, it probably would need to be able to survive on its own, being that plants are [[wikipedia:Autotroph|autotrophs]] -- unlike viruses, most bacteria, or animals. It's hard to picture the great Daodan organism living outside a host as a mere potted plant. | ||
:'''Bacteria''' | :'''Bacteria''' | ||
::Pros: | ::Pros: Being microscopic allows the Daodan to be more mysterious, and also more menacing and alien when eventually viewed through a microscope. Localizing it in the form of a simple green-celled flora or an insect or mouse-sized animal, could easily trivialize the Daodan organism that is so key to our story. | ||
::Cons: They're boring! Anything that we can do with bacteria, we can do with the "enigmata" below. Plus, the more mysterious we make the Daodan, the further outside known science it becomes, allowing us more story-telling freedom. | ::Cons: They're boring! Anything that we can do with bacteria, we can do with the "enigmata" below. Plus, the more mysterious we make the Daodan, the further outside known science it becomes, allowing us more story-telling freedom. | ||