Jump to content

Oni2:Slaves of War/Polylectiloquy: Difference between revisions

new question on immortality
(new question on immortality)
Line 239: Line 239:
:B. She might not always be transformed or able to transform.
:B. She might not always be transformed or able to transform.
:C. There's the amnesia option proposed elsewhere, but amnesia wouldn't remove her strength, only her skill. Still, having to re-learn fighting would make the game more challenging. But I am not a fan of a contrived "restart" that wants to drag a character back to where they were.
:C. There's the amnesia option proposed elsewhere, but amnesia wouldn't remove her strength, only her skill. Still, having to re-learn fighting would make the game more challenging. But I am not a fan of a contrived "restart" that wants to drag a character back to where they were.
===Wouldn't the Daodan make the host immortal?===
"Immortal" here being defined as "not experiencing natural death" rather than "totally unkillable", the question really is, Won't the amazing healing abilities of the Daodan keep a host perpetually young? To my mind, all of the following are possible:
:A. The Daodan is not perfect, so it cannot make the host perfect (i.e., remove a basic flaw in the cellular processes).
:B. The Daodan was designed to improve an organism but not to grant it immortality. The designers may have a philosophical or cultural reason for Daodan hosts or the general populace not living forever.
:C. The Daodan has no effect on aging because it doesn't affect the shortening of telomeres.
:D. The Daodan shortens the host lifespan because it forces rapid cell doubling. More frequent cell division accelerates the aging process.