19,585
edits
Talk:Tanker: Difference between revisions
m
link fix
m (link fix) |
m (link fix) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Well, I can't disagree with anything in your post directly above (darn!), so I'll just say that I will be focusing on contributing in parallel to BSL and Tanker, both over time, then moving onto other enemy pages after Tanker if that one isn't too arduous. Re your last sentence, I suppose you could argue that the wiki should be empowering creativity and all that, but I think the wiki's focus has been ''so'' much on that (mainly in the way of technical documentation that informs modding) that we've neglected the more basic content that newbies would want, like actually just saying, "Here's the enemies and what they look like and how they fight". Granted, there may not be many newbies this far into the life of the game, but I always thought OniGalore was intended to be an all-purpose repository of knowledge about Oni, in which case the basic stuff is sorely neglected. You'd have to go search for FAQs on other sites to answer those questions. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 17:49, 18 March 2008 (CET) | Well, I can't disagree with anything in your post directly above (darn!), so I'll just say that I will be focusing on contributing in parallel to BSL and Tanker, both over time, then moving onto other enemy pages after Tanker if that one isn't too arduous. Re your last sentence, I suppose you could argue that the wiki should be empowering creativity and all that, but I think the wiki's focus has been ''so'' much on that (mainly in the way of technical documentation that informs modding) that we've neglected the more basic content that newbies would want, like actually just saying, "Here's the enemies and what they look like and how they fight". Granted, there may not be many newbies this far into the life of the game, but I always thought OniGalore was intended to be an all-purpose repository of knowledge about Oni, in which case the basic stuff is sorely neglected. You'd have to go search for FAQs on other sites to answer those questions. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 17:49, 18 March 2008 (CET) | ||
:Have a look at the new [[Quotes/Manual# | :Have a look at the new [[Quotes/Manual#Character_Bios_-_Friends_and_Foes|manual section]]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 03:57, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ||
::Wow, nice, geyser. What this indicates to me, and let's see if you agree, is that there is no more need for a page dedicated to Tankers, another dedicated to Ninjas, etc., in any general way. So we could delete the Tanker page. ''BUT'', I still see usefulness in writing subpages under "Combat moves" that list moves and key comboes that trigger them. I think that's the only info missing now, aside from stats, which for now are impractical to document. I would like to move the (draft of a) moves list on "Tanker" to a subpage of "Combat moves", so let's leave this page up for now. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 14:58, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ::Wow, nice, geyser. What this indicates to me, and let's see if you agree, is that there is no more need for a page dedicated to Tankers, another dedicated to Ninjas, etc., in any general way. So we could delete the Tanker page. ''BUT'', I still see usefulness in writing subpages under "Combat moves" that list moves and key comboes that trigger them. I think that's the only info missing now, aside from stats, which for now are impractical to document. I would like to move the (draft of a) moves list on "Tanker" to a subpage of "Combat moves", so let's leave this page up for now. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 14:58, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ||
::Okay, as an example of what I'm thinking of doing with all playable characters, look at '''Combat moves/KONOKO''' and tell me if it looks promising (it's not totally done, of course). --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 16:55, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ::Okay, as an example of what I'm thinking of doing with all playable characters, look at '''Combat moves/KONOKO''' and tell me if it looks promising (it's not totally done, of course). --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 16:55, 19 March 2008 (CET) | ||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
"Also, making "duh" sections for basic punches and kicks rather than for whole set of punch or kick combos (e.g., PPP and PPK together) is an awful waste of space/time/whatever..." & "I encourage you to create stubs dedicated to single techniques or complementary sets" | "Also, making "duh" sections for basic punches and kicks rather than for whole set of punch or kick combos (e.g., PPP and PPK together) is an awful waste of space/time/whatever..." & "I encourage you to create stubs dedicated to single techniques or complementary sets" | ||
:Okay, well, I wanted your opinion before I went any further, and that's why, because now I can try something different without having spent too much time on this yet. I'll post back here when I've revised the combat page to be more in line with your suggestions. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 14:36, 20 March 2008 (CET) | :Okay, well, I wanted your opinion before I went any further, and that's why, because now I can try something different without having spent too much time on this yet. I'll post back here when I've revised the combat page to be more in line with your suggestions. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 14:36, 20 March 2008 (CET) | ||
[[Category:Syndicate]] | |||