8,028
edits
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (small updates on WCG history: China aiming for economic standards, no proven bounties in Afghanistan from China/Russia) |
||
Line 646: | Line 646: | ||
===History=== | ===History=== | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Food for thoughts: | |||
Amerika über Jahrzehnte noch in einem gefährlichen Zustand: | Amerika über Jahrzehnte noch in einem gefährlichen Zustand: | ||
* mediale Bubble von Reps/Dems, Polarisierung, Spaltung der US-Gesellschaft, zu starke religöse Prägung (Creationisten, etc.), Symptom: Hang zu Verschwörungstheorien / "alternativer Fakten", 70 % der Rep glauben US Wahl wurde manipuliert, in der Summe Amerika immer leichter Ziel russischer/chinesischer Desinformationskampanien | * mediale Bubble von Reps/Dems, Polarisierung, Spaltung der US-Gesellschaft, zu starke religöse Prägung (Creationisten, etc.), Symptom: Hang zu Verschwörungstheorien / "alternativer Fakten", 70 % der Rep glauben US Wahl wurde manipuliert, in der Summe Amerika immer leichter Ziel russischer/chinesischer Desinformationskampanien? | ||
* "Gemeinschaftliches" Hacking von China und Russland | * "Gemeinschaftliches" Hacking von China und Russland? | ||
* Feng: Tianxia ? | * Feng: Tianxia ? | ||
-->Napoleon once said: "China is a sleeping giant. Let her sleep, for when she wakes she will move the world." | -->Napoleon once said: "China is a sleeping giant. Let her sleep, for when she wakes she will move the world." | ||
Spite the European Union's goal to show more united strength in the global power game, it remained a paper tiger compared to | Spite the European Union's goal to show more united strength in the global power game, it remained a paper tiger compared to the actual super powers. The member states were constantly quarreling over domestic and foreign policy with no clear vision for their own position in the world. This self-made chaos, the poor status of digitization in general and the missing ownership of companies for the digital economy (hence even more dependency to USA) were all hampering factors which made it very easy for China to pass the EU in power. <!--As Europe's economic leader Germany's digital ridiculous backwardness is especially to be criticized. (Missing impulses/directions/expertise/weight.)--> | ||
China's ambitions are basically everywhere. They reached '''economic dominance'''. Ultimately China had created strong dependencies in the [https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/16/economy/rcep-trade-agreement-intl-hnk/index.html Asian-Pacific region], in [[wp:China%E2%80%93Latin_America_relations|South America]], in the EU by having build a new silk road, dupe them in trade contracts, getting shares in key industries/companies [[wp:Desertec_industrial_initiative#High-voltage_direct_current_(HVDC)|including energy production]], farming their know-how for their own [[wp:de:Made_in_China_2025#Strategische_Zielsetzung_bis_2049|technological development]], in the end turning EU into just another export market. Also, [[wp:Africa–China_economic_relations|China invested]] so much into African companies, infrastructure, and military goods that they trapped [https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2019/10/03/what-china-is-really-up-to-in-africa/ Africa in debts] or shares and mostly removed European's and American's influence from the continent. China needed Africa also to outsource the production of low-value goods and get cheep raw materials. (For this reason later renegade US states and their military (New Confederations) had chosen African territory for their proxy wars. They wanted to thwart China's growth strategy and hinder the installation of an all-enclosing WCG. The African states still remember [[wp:Scramble_for_Africa|Europe's phase of colonialism]] and hence have a somewhat open ear the NC's actual pretextual arguments but see it difficult not to continue trade with China.) | China's ambitions are basically everywhere. They reached '''economic dominance'''. Ultimately China had created strong dependencies in the [https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/16/economy/rcep-trade-agreement-intl-hnk/index.html Asian-Pacific region], in [[wp:China%E2%80%93Latin_America_relations|South America]], in the EU by having build a new silk road, dupe them in trade contracts, getting shares in key industries/companies [[wp:Desertec_industrial_initiative#High-voltage_direct_current_(HVDC)|including energy production]], farming their know-how for their own [[wp:de:Made_in_China_2025#Strategische_Zielsetzung_bis_2049|technological development]], then [https://www.heise.de/hintergrund/Missing-Link-Wie-sich-China-zur-Normungsweltmacht-aufschwingen-will-6146295.html declaring their own market controlling standards], in the end turning EU into just another export market. Also, [[wp:Africa–China_economic_relations|China invested]] so much into African companies, infrastructure, and military goods that they trapped [https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2019/10/03/what-china-is-really-up-to-in-africa/ Africa in debts] or shares and mostly removed European's and American's influence from the continent. China needed Africa also to outsource the production of low-value goods and get cheep raw materials. (For this reason later renegade US states and their military (New Confederations) had chosen African territory for their proxy wars. They wanted to thwart China's growth strategy and hinder the installation of an all-enclosing WCG. The African states still remember [[wp:Scramble_for_Africa|Europe's phase of colonialism]] and hence have a somewhat open ear the NC's actual pretextual arguments but see it difficult not to continue trade with China.) | ||
The strongest dependencies China has created can be found within their new "domestic" Asian-Pacific market. One state after another became lost in China's economic and '''therefore political gravity'''. | The strongest dependencies China has created can be found within their new "domestic" Asian-Pacific market. One state after another became lost in China's economic and '''therefore political gravity'''. | ||
Having all this power China began to aim higher. By now they could risk being independent from USA if they really wanted to. Therefore '''selling all their US debts''' – sometimes named "'''nuclear option'''" – became a much less theoretical option for '''blackmailing'''. This | Having all this power China began to aim higher. By now they could risk being independent from USA if they really wanted to. Therefore '''selling all their US debts''' – sometimes named "'''nuclear option'''" – became a much less theoretical option for '''blackmailing'''. This problem grew when China had a cold war with USA - forcing them to spend so much money in an arms race that the old super power almost reached its limit in serving its debts. China almost dead-raced USA as USA had done with the Soviet Union.<!--Funny how a nuclear threat can also be a economic weapon. In 2021 information went public that China is in progress of catching in terms of nuclear deterrence. The content of the new silos is not confirmed yet.--> | ||
<!--Add more economic points here? wp:Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991--> | |||
wp:Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991 | For a long time Russia had intended to stay an independent player but given enough push and pull factors they very silently accepted being China's '''junior partner against their common enemy''' USA. Meanwhile Russia kept delivering wood, oil, natural gas, thorium reactor ships and military goods. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262485473_The_Russia-China_Security_Partnership_in_the_Asia-Pacific_Region_Conjectural_and_Structural_Dimensions Russia helped out in securing the Asian Pacific region] against USA's "return to Asia" policy which in turn forced Washington to focus less on Eastern Europe - especially the Caucasus region. | ||
--> For a long time Russia had intended to stay an independent player but given enough push and pull factors they very silently accepted being China's '''junior partner against their common enemy''' USA. Meanwhile Russia kept delivering wood, oil, natural gas, thorium reactor ships and military goods. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262485473_The_Russia-China_Security_Partnership_in_the_Asia-Pacific_Region_Conjectural_and_Structural_Dimensions Russia helped out in securing the Asian Pacific region] against USA's "return to Asia" policy which in turn forced Washington to focus less on Eastern Europe - especially the Caucasus region. | |||
Meanwhile Kusnezow Feng, China's renowned and respected star philosopher, wrote a number of scenarios in which the world would turn upside down in best case or witness great filters in worst case within the next century unless mankind would act in unison. | Meanwhile Kusnezow Feng, China's renowned and respected star philosopher, wrote a number of scenarios in which the world would turn upside down in best case or witness great filters in worst case within the next century unless mankind would act in unison. |
edits