8,452
edits
Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
====Europe==== | ====Europe==== | ||
Europe can only preserve its sovereignty by becoming as much self-sustaining as possible. Making itself independent from superpowers by new technologies and political unity is key. A true normalization of relationships with Russia will be likely delayed until US influences are displaced and Russia realizes its expendability to a 2060-future China | Europe can only preserve its sovereignty by becoming as much self-sustaining as possible. Making itself independent from superpowers by new technologies and political unity is key. A true normalization of relationships with Russia will be likely delayed until US influences are displaced and Russia realizes its expendability to a 2060-future China. | ||
Wanted: A strategy for viable pacifism. [...] | '''Emancipation from USA.''' There are two scenarios to improve enforcement of European interests. | ||
* A) As an early adaptor of minimum-military the EU can free resources to successfully compensate effects of climate change and improve living standards. A certain amount of diversification is not a weakness but a resource. '''A "pluralistic-symbiotic think tank" can better work out alternative solutions and offer them anyone in need - even to (or especially to) highly militarized, ideological narrowed (gleichgeschaltete) superpowers.''' - It's a risky move as superpowers must recognize Europe as neutral ground so they can profit from it in other ways then depleting it. -- Wanted: A strategy for viable pacifism. [...] | |||
* B) A semi-militarized version. With an European army with focus on east-European partners to ease their security concerns. USA, Russia and China will be given all the same chances to do business with Europe. No special treatments. Critical infrastructure (ownership) will stay under European control at all times. [...] | |||
====Russia==== | ====Russia==== | ||
Russia assured multiple times that it will not attack Ukraine. If Russia attacks the Ukraine nonetheless - in whatever form, no matter whether a false flag action happen before or not - NATO will be forced to speak out sanctions. Germany will be forced to stop NS2 and give up its pacifistic | Russia assured multiple times that it will not attack Ukraine. If Russia attacks the Ukraine nonetheless - in whatever form, no matter whether a false flag action happen before or not - NATO will be forced to speak out sanctions. Germany will be forced to stop NS2 and give up its pacifistic basic attitude. If the attack is big enough it would even trigger a new cold war. | ||
Russia already let NATO feel how it is to have enemy troops at the boarder. For a moralistic victory all they have to do is to finish their maneuver and let their forces return home. Though they might play for time to push NATO into making concessions. | Russia already let NATO feel how it is to have enemy troops at the boarder. For a moralistic victory all they have to do is to finish their maneuver and let their forces return home. Though they might play for time to push NATO into making concessions. | ||
| Line 257: | Line 259: | ||
====USA==== | ====USA==== | ||
USA tries to normalize their relationship to the Islamic world ([[wp:Abraham_Accords#Aftermath|Abraham Accords]], lifting sanctions on Iran) as Russia and China strengthen their own relationship more and more. It's their [[wp:Islamophobia_in_China|last straw]] to significantly increase their weight in the game of superpowers. | Today USA rightfully thinks of NATO being dysfunctional* (this has historic reasons) - and the European partners don't have strong interests in securing the Pacific. This led to the less powerful but dedicated alliance AUKUS. Besides that USA tries to normalize their relationship to the Islamic world ([[wp:Abraham_Accords#Aftermath|Abraham Accords]], lifting sanctions on Iran) as Russia and China strengthen their own relationship more and more. It's their [[wp:Islamophobia_in_China|last straw]] to significantly increase their weight in the game of superpowers. | ||
: * NATO was a self-defense alliance against a hypothetical new aggressive Germany and then against Soviet Union and communism. What started with a legit objective became more and more obsolete and is now in greater part a geopolitical tool of USA. | |||
===War and money=== | ===War and money=== | ||