Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions

Talk:Restless Souls/Summary (view source)

473 bytes added , 30 September 2022

m

no edit summary

8,452

edits

@@ Line 559: / Line 559: @@
 Pro:
 * Biden wished NS2 to be ''dead''. An inactivation doesn't count as such. A literal destruction would have been needed.
-* With NS2's destruction Germany is even more depending on LNG fracking gas. (This is usually a CT argument.)
+* This ''destroyed'' the inner-German discussions of using NS2 for good.
+* With the destruction of NS1 and NS2 Germany is even more certainly depending on LNG fracking gas. (This is usually a CT argument.)
 * Pure speculation: After Russia's nuclear threatening the destruction of the pipelines could be a sign to Moskau to no further escalate or else pipelines for China and India will be damaged.
@@ Line 567: / Line 568: @@
 |valign=top|
 Neutral:
-* The detection of chemical traces from explosives proves nothing. It could have been a false-flag attack.
+* The detection of chemical traces from explosives proves nothing. It could have been a false-flag attack. (This can only be a first step.)
 Pro:
+* The gas prices went up.
+* Distraction from the referendum in the occupation territories.
+* The fossile age is about to end. In the meantime Germany will basically rely on non-Russian sources. Therefore the Russian conclusion might be that the pipelines became negligible.
 * Suspicious: The Russians were not really upset / surprised when the pipelines blew up.
-* The gas prices went up.
+* Pure speculation: This is a threatening against Europe. Other pipelines could be destroyed.
 Contra: