8,013
edits
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 558: | Line 558: | ||
-- | -- | ||
=== | ===Can GPT be creative?=== | ||
Yes and no. Due to pattern recognition, it is easy to argue that | Yes and no. Due to pattern recognition, it is easy to argue that a GPT can be creative if you differentiate between [https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/forschung/ki-kreativitaet-101.html "Little-C"] and [[wp:Creativity#.22Four_C.22_model|"Big-C"]]. The "generative" in "GPT" can be seen as a synonym for being "creative" if it is "Little-C": in that case GPT will '''generate more of the same and similar''' by remixing and changing existing data. A GPT can trick us in thinking that it possess creativity. But that is only so because it can combine content and (known) content packing algorithms. When we want to judge GPT's creativity the content itself and the speed of combining is irrelevant because that comes directly from the storage and processing power. '''For possessing Big C a GPT needs to be able to come up with totally new algorithms, not just altered, stacked or remixed ones.''' | ||
===[[wp:Meme#Etymology|Meme war]]=== | ===[[wp:Meme#Etymology|Meme war]]=== |
edits