8,452
edits
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (streamlining Greens section) |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 589: | Line 589: | ||
======Grüne====== | ======Grüne====== | ||
Regardless of historical precursor movements, reaching planetary boundaries inevitably leads to the issue of sustainability. Nature conservation, climate protection, sustainable management. When the '''long-term traumatizing climate crisis''' is one day overcome, the Greens are likely to vegetate around the 5% hurdle or cease to exist altogether. Either because the topic of sustainability has been '''assimilated by society as a whole''' or because democracy and parties have developed into something new by then. | |||
''' | '''Party: Bündnis 90/Die Grünen''' | ||
"The green and anti-nuclear party." (The well-off intellectuals, old civil rights activists, new left, pool of minorities, and ... traditional Greens.) Potential new voters were not afraid of their core program but the new ideological-tinted topics and Greens' missing experience, doing | "The green and anti-nuclear party." (The well-off intellectuals, old civil rights activists, new left, pool of minorities, and ... traditional Greens.) Potential new voters were not afraid of their '''core program''' but the '''new ideological-tinted topics''' and Greens' '''missing experience''', and '''not doing enough Realpolitik'''. Also, they were '''perceived as hypermoralists with no strong sense for social topics'''. The "Last Generation" brought them constant negative publicity. Political opponents of the Greens couldn't have asked for a better Trojan horse. One topic that will sooner or later hit them is the [https://archive.is/rCjVm use of genetic engineering]. It is no longer scientifically tenable to reject them. | ||
======The non-voters====== | ======The non-voters====== |
edits