8,013
edits
Talk:Restless Souls/Summary: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1,676: | Line 1,676: | ||
'''The AfD can portray other parties as ideological and irrational at any time by formulating objectives that are in the general interest and in scope of the constitution, bringing them to a vote and then failing. This pitfall should be avoided.''' | '''The AfD can portray other parties as ideological and irrational at any time by formulating objectives that are in the general interest and in scope of the constitution, bringing them to a vote and then failing. This pitfall should be avoided.''' | ||
So anyone who absolutely has to work with the AfD should be smarter: The AfD has become radicalized. As '''democrats''', you '''cannot declare a coalition''' with them. '''Hitler showed this can go terribly wrong.''' But democrats can '''offer a door to deradicalization''': Voting together has to happen on a case-by-case basis. There must be no operational blindness. This '''decision''' has to be individually made '''for every single case'''. This | So anyone who absolutely has to work with the AfD should be smarter: The AfD has become radicalized. As '''democrats''', you '''cannot declare a coalition''' with them. '''Hitler showed this can go terribly wrong.''' But democrats can '''offer a door to deradicalization''': Voting together has to happen on a case-by-case basis. There must be no operational blindness. This '''decision''' has to be individually made '''for every single case'''. This would be the firewall in the actual sense of the IT word: selective, protecting democracy against harmful influences. | ||
'''Alternative to a case-by-case approach''' | '''Alternative to a case-by-case approach''' | ||
| Line 1,694: | Line 1,694: | ||
'''Party: DAVA''' | '''Party: DAVA''' | ||
A potential splinter party. [https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/plus249801684/Dava-Partei-Hass-auf-Israel-und-Lobbyismus-fuer-Erdogan-das-steht-hinter-der-neuen-Partei.html Orientation:] Islamistic, Turkish nationalistic, romanticizing Erdogan antisemitic. CDU and SPD would probably lose most of the votes. Overall, DAVA is another symptom of an inefficient integration policy that has created a completely unnecessary representation vacuum and probably boosted by | A potential splinter party. [https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/plus249801684/Dava-Partei-Hass-auf-Israel-und-Lobbyismus-fuer-Erdogan-das-steht-hinter-der-neuen-Partei.html Orientation:] Islamistic, Turkish nationalistic, romanticizing Erdogan, antisemitic. CDU and SPD would probably lose most of the votes. Overall, DAVA is another symptom of an inefficient integration policy that has created a completely unnecessary representation vacuum and was probably boosted by an additional motivation from latest changes that ease the receipt of dual citizenship. In this context, the imam training, which [https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/islamkolleg-104.html Germany took over] much too late, should also be mentioned. | ||
======Liberals====== | ======Liberals====== | ||