Jump to content

Restless Souls/Research/War/Propaganda: Difference between revisions

m
steamlining
mNo edit summary
m (steamlining)
Line 27: Line 27:
*** Action against judges and [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/can-atalay-erdo-an-greift-verfassungsgericht-an-19306038.html constitutional judges]
*** Action against judges and [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/can-atalay-erdo-an-greift-verfassungsgericht-an-19306038.html constitutional judges]
*** After a [[wp:2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt|Putsch attempted 2016]] there was a shady [https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/nach-dem-putschversuch-in-der-tuerkei-mehr-als-100-000-menschen-von-erdogans-saeuberungswelle-betroffen-1.3126220 political cleansing] which affected more than 100,000 people.
*** After a [[wp:2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt|Putsch attempted 2016]] there was a shady [https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/nach-dem-putschversuch-in-der-tuerkei-mehr-als-100-000-menschen-von-erdogans-saeuberungswelle-betroffen-1.3126220 political cleansing] which affected more than 100,000 people.
** USA, Trump
** USA, Trump<!--Beyond ''political advertisement''. Pretty much of the stuff aims for a permanent right shift.-->
*** Inciting populism, spread of fake news and conspiracy theories. However, Trump's means of communication of choice were Twitter and Fox News.
*** Inciting populism, spread of fake news and conspiracy theories.
*** Whistled back to the angry [[wp:January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack|Mob at the Capitol]] too late. Since then, he has been using the lie about the stolen election.
**** Example: He whistled back to the angry [[wp:January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack|Mob at the Capitol]] too late. Since then, he has been using the lie about the stolen election.<!--Basically, Trump wanted to create pressure on the election. But the mass went out of control. Presumable, he thought: ''Let's see where this ends.'' That didn't work out in his favor. Without the will to take self-damage, he then tried roll with it. The people got (more or less) a "full pardon". Trump rarely take step back. He is always trying to avoid the impression of weakness.-->
*** Trump has already planned a political purge - Project 2025, Schedule F - for his second term in office and would probably accompany it with the Deep State narrative and renewed allusions to alleged anti-corruption. (''Draining the swamp in Washington.'')
*** Trump's right-wing allies envisioned a political purge through initiatives such as Project 2025 and Schedule F. To justify this, the narrative of the "Deep State" and the call for its destruction as a supposed anti-corruption measure were used again. (''Draining the swamp in Washington.'')
*** Putting pressure on traditional media and universities.
*** Imposed conservative constitutional judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
*** Imposed conservative constitutional judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
** Poland, Kaczyński
** Poland, Kaczyński
Line 43: Line 44:
*** Development of a certain ''team spirit'' (esprit de corps) as a subspectrum within the larger [[wp:Political_spectrum|Left-Right-Spectrum]].
*** Development of a certain ''team spirit'' (esprit de corps) as a subspectrum within the larger [[wp:Political_spectrum|Left-Right-Spectrum]].
*** Setting priorities through niche service. -- In general, the diverse political orientation and focus (the actual reasons for this put aside) is seen as an enrichment.
*** Setting priorities through niche service. -- In general, the diverse political orientation and focus (the actual reasons for this put aside) is seen as an enrichment.
* [[wp:de:Haltungsjournalismus|Attitude journalism]] -- Apparently some of the criticism of attitude journalism stems from a narrative on the right-wing spectrum. The setting of topics by progressive representatives is perceived as an attempt at paternalism or is defamed as such. This corresponds to AfD thought patterns. At the same time, some topics are not examined critically enough, so that preconceived opinions can shorten research. Claus Kleber also drew a [https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article235929216/Claus-Kleber-Ideologie-vergiftet-den-Journalismus.html mixed conclusion]. -- The bottom line: The progressives are a little too uncritical when it comes to migration and integration and the conservatives are too hypersensitive when it comes to green issues.
* [[wp:de:Haltungsjournalismus|Attitude journalism]]
** Some of the criticism of attitude journalism stems from a narrative on the right-wing spectrum. The setting of topics by progressive representatives is perceived as an attempt at paternalism or is defamed as such. This corresponds to AfD thought patterns.
** At the same time, some topics are not examined critically enough, so that preconceived opinions can shorten research. Claus Kleber also drew a [https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article235929216/Claus-Kleber-Ideologie-vergiftet-den-Journalismus.html mixed conclusion].


===Self-running dynamics===
===Self-running dynamics===
8,760

edits