Page history
Oni2_talk:Truth Number Zero/Digest
15 May 2022
4 May 2022
23 May 2020
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+4
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?: typos
m+39
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?: something like that
+2,410
no edit summary
m+391
→Speeding up unification: sheesh
+240
22 May 2020
→Speeding up unification: sorry if this rains on the parade
+519
→Speeding up unification: more cents
+273
→Speeding up unification: cents
+456
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
+201
one more cent
m+356
two cents
m+564
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+10
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+3
→Speeding up unification: really?
+382
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
+1,434
→Speeding up unification: Soon(TM)
+424
no edit summary
m+170
no edit summary
m+449
no edit summary
m+116
21 May 2020
→Re: Was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?
m+1
→Re: Was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?
m+1
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+1
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+17
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?: typos
+290
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+2
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - How can they be so confident about it?
m+13
→The Daodan Chrysalis is unproven "super" technology - Isn't there too much confidence?: blurb
+9,040
→Re: Was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?: indentation, capitalization, typos
m+15
→Re: Was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?: hmph
+5,481
no edit summary
m+50
no edit summary
m−4
no edit summary
m+3,241
20 May 2020
→Follow-up question: was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?: extra answer point
+799
→Follow-up question: was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?
m+118
→Follow-up question: was the Daodan's danger really clear from the beginning?
m+14
→Dangerousness of Daodan: sorry if too much
+5,119
no edit summary
m+1,237
no edit summary
m+22
→Isn't the secret goal more naive than the official goal?: indentation
m+12
apparently it's "naive" in English, without the umlaut
m−7
no edit summary
+8
no edit summary
m+72
no edit summary
m+2
tentative answer
+4,194
no edit summary
mno edit summary
m+175
Created page with "''Arguably, adapting to overwhelming pollution - and ultimately embracing the BioCrisis as a new way of life - is both '''naïve and cynical'''.'' ''Hasegawa's true plan (und..."
+474