8,446
edits
No edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
::Ah ok, always fork... But I don't think we can use iterate already. "something2 = BSL_chaos; iterate over something2 using somethingX" didn't produce error messages but how can we set iterate variable to numbers? Using "var int somethingX = 3" failed. :| --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 10:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | ::Ah ok, always fork... But I don't think we can use iterate already. "something2 = BSL_chaos; iterate over something2 using somethingX" didn't produce error messages but how can we set iterate variable to numbers? Using "var int somethingX = 3" failed. :| --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 10:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Well normally an "iterate" command is used on an array. So if we could make an array, we might be able to say "iterate over theArray using somethingX", and on each runthrough, somethingX would be set to the next element in theArray. If they decided that arrays were not needed, or too much work to implement, they might have removed them from BSL. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | :::Well normally an "iterate" command is used on an array. So if we could make an array, we might be able to say "iterate over theArray using somethingX", and on each runthrough, somethingX would be set to the next element in theArray. If they decided that arrays were not needed, or too much work to implement, they might have removed them from BSL. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::"if we could make an array" Maybe we need a new [[OBD:StNA|StNA]] file. --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 21:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |
edits