User talk:Paradox-01: Difference between revisions
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User talk:Paradox-01/Archive1|old talk page #1]] | [[User talk:Paradox-01/Archive1|old talk page #1]] | ||
== Doing anything with this? == | ==Doing anything with this?== | ||
[[XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character]] — I can't figure out what it's for, and it's uncategorized ^_^ --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 23:53, 26 March 2020 (CET) | [[XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character]] — I can't figure out what it's for, and it's uncategorized ^_^ --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 23:53, 26 March 2020 (CET) | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Hi there, I see you've discovered the new tree list template :-) Some other pages that could make use of it, where currently we have a "manual" tree: [[XML:TRAC]], [[XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character]], [[XML:TSFF]], [[XML:Impt]], and [[XML:ONLV]] (not sure about this one; it already has a complex table, would using tree list improve it?). Just dropping this note here since you seem to appreciate the template and I am already working on a few other things at once. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 16:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | Hi there, I see you've discovered the new tree list template :-) Some other pages that could make use of it, where currently we have a "manual" tree: [[XML:TRAC]], [[XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character]], [[XML:TSFF]], [[XML:Impt]], and [[XML:ONLV]] (not sure about this one; it already has a complex table, would using tree list improve it?). Just dropping this note here since you seem to appreciate the template and I am already working on a few other things at once. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 16:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Done. I kept ONLV as it was because the table shows files and embedded instances better than the tree list could. --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 20:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | : Done. I kept ONLV as it was because the table shows files and embedded instances better than the tree list could. --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 20:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Email working?== | |||
A couple of us noticed that you haven't been responding to email even though you're active on the wiki and we're wondering if we have the right address for you. Feel free to drop me an email at my usual address if you've got a new address we should be using. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 13:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks for the heads-up. Consider the issue resolved. --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) | |||
[[Category:Userspace]] | [[Category:Userspace]] |
Latest revision as of 21:38, 16 January 2024
Doing anything with this?
XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character — I can't figure out what it's for, and it's uncategorized ^_^ --Iritscen (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2020 (CET)
- This was supposed to be an XML Tutorial. In the past Daodan modding was a popular/recurring question. (As seen here.) --paradox-01 (talk) 09:05, 27 March 2020 (CET)
New tree list
Hi there, I see you've discovered the new tree list template :-) Some other pages that could make use of it, where currently we have a "manual" tree: XML:TRAC, XML:Adding Daodan powers to a character, XML:TSFF, XML:Impt, and XML:ONLV (not sure about this one; it already has a complex table, would using tree list improve it?). Just dropping this note here since you seem to appreciate the template and I am already working on a few other things at once. --Iritscen (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done. I kept ONLV as it was because the table shows files and embedded instances better than the tree list could. --paradox-01 (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Email working?
A couple of us noticed that you haven't been responding to email even though you're active on the wiki and we're wondering if we have the right address for you. Feel free to drop me an email at my usual address if you've got a new address we should be using. --Iritscen (talk) 13:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. Consider the issue resolved. --paradox-01 (talk)