19,577
edits
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:::Well normally an "iterate" command is used on an array. So if we could make an array, we might be able to say "iterate over theArray using somethingX", and on each runthrough, somethingX would be set to the next element in theArray. If they decided that arrays were not needed, or too much work to implement, they might have removed them from BSL. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | :::Well normally an "iterate" command is used on an array. So if we could make an array, we might be able to say "iterate over theArray using somethingX", and on each runthrough, somethingX would be set to the next element in theArray. If they decided that arrays were not needed, or too much work to implement, they might have removed them from BSL. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 11:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::"if we could make an array" Maybe we need a new [[OBD:StNA|StNA]] file. --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 21:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | ::::"if we could make an array" Maybe we need a new [[OBD:StNA|StNA]] file. --[[User:Paradox-01|Paradox-01]] 21:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Eh, that's not really the same thing. We'd need to insert new code into the existing BSL code to add array functionality. Unless it's already lurking in the source and we just haven't figured out how to use it yet. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 23:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |