User talk:Ssg: Difference between revisions

From OniGalore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (fixed the array indices in the C-style declarations)
m (Two templates with the same code. Which one should I use?)
Line 1: Line 1:
<font color=red>Answers are in red.</font>
I've found the following two templates:
 
 
*OBD_Table_Header
*OBDth
 
 
Both contain the same code:
 
 
<nowiki>|- BGCOLOR="#E9E9E9" ! WIDTH=5% | Offset || WIDTH=5% | Type || WIDTH=10% | Raw Hex || WIDTH=10% | Value || WIDTH=70% | Description</nowiki>
 
 
Which one should I use? IMO, OBDth looks better.
 
 
<!--
<nowiki><font color=red>Answers are in red.</font>


<small>Mine are in small print.</small>
<small>Mine are in small print.</small>
Line 354: Line 371:
:We don't have to agree on that matter and I'm quite happy either way.
:We don't have to agree on that matter and I'm quite happy either way.
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 00:59, 6 September 2007 (CEST)
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 00:59, 6 September 2007 (CEST)
</small>
</small></nowiki>
-->


<!-- please don't delete this
<!-- please don't delete this
http://14mb.de/u/ccc/botright.gif
http://14mb.de/u/ccc/botright.gif
-->
-->

Revision as of 12:31, 9 September 2007

I've found the following two templates:


  • OBD_Table_Header
  • OBDth


Both contain the same code:


|- BGCOLOR="#E9E9E9" ! WIDTH=5% | Offset || WIDTH=5% | Type || WIDTH=10% | Raw Hex || WIDTH=10% | Value || WIDTH=70% | Description


Which one should I use? IMO, OBDth looks better.