Talk:Oni engine patches (Mac PPC)/changelog: Difference between revisions

From OniGalore
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(env_ray_number)
Line 6: Line 6:


Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). [[User:Neo|Neo]]
Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). [[User:Neo|Neo]]
:Neo, geyser asked me to test env_ray_number and to see if the call back was setup in the Mac engine [[User:EdT|EdT]]


Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. [[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST)
Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. [[User:RossyMiles|rossy]] 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST)


I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. [[User:Neo|Neo]]
I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. [[User:Neo|Neo]]

Revision as of 00:01, 22 October 2008

"at 0x16E834 Replaced chr_focus with chr_health"

Why would you do that? Chr_focus is very useful. Gumby 10:24, 20 October 2008 (CEST)

When it comes to replacing functions, you have to consider the length of the name and signature string. chr_health had a longer signature string "chr_index:int [hit_points:int | ]" than chr_focus "chr_index:int" So it will easier to find another function to replace chr_focus with the shorter signature string. EdT

Hey, why would you want env_ray_number anyway? You cannot set it higher than 20 and you don't want to set it lower than 20 either (unless you're CPU isn't fast enough :) ). Neo

Neo, geyser asked me to test env_ray_number and to see if the call back was setup in the Mac engine EdT

Are the signature strings actually used by the engine? I assume there would be no problem if they were left blank. rossy 12:40, 21 October 2008 (CEST)

I don't see how it could parse the command line without those signatures. Neo