5,391
edits
User talk:Neo: Difference between revisions
re:hexagon, mostly
No edit summary |
(re:hexagon, mostly) |
||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
:::Hexagon "wrongness" - not sure what exactly you are talking about. Sure, it needs to be scaled up a bit (somewhere between x20 and x40), it needs to be rotated a bit and some textures have non power of 2 sizes. Appart from that "it just works". Currently I'm investigating some "falling through the floor" problems but it appears that the problem is in OniSplit and not in Hexagon. | :::Hexagon "wrongness" - not sure what exactly you are talking about. Sure, it needs to be scaled up a bit (somewhere between x20 and x40), it needs to be rotated a bit and some textures have non power of 2 sizes. Appart from that "it just works". Currently I'm investigating some "falling through the floor" problems but it appears that the problem is in OniSplit and not in Hexagon. | ||
:::[[User:Neo|Neo]] | :::[[User:Neo|Neo]] | ||
:Well, I'm OK with bgr32, actually (and I'd be even more OK if I could use bgra32 ^_^ ) - it's not like the levels we're importing so far have hundreds of detailed textures... So the only critical flaw with hexagon was non-power-of-two texture sizes? is that really a critical flaw (as in "blam"), or did 'Scen mess up somewhere else (he's the one who reported a blam after importing hexagon2.dae; I didn't try)? About the scale - it's funny, what units is the original in, then? I thought the original was in millimeters, and hexagon2.dae in decimeters, so that it should be scaled up by 1.5 or 2, not more... 30 you say? huh. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 02:00, 11 November 2008 (CET) | |||