8,018
edits
User talk:Paradox-01/Archive1: Difference between revisions
→New overview
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 485: | Line 485: | ||
::Basically, yes. I like that "File types" page, I just would like the descriptions to be a bit longer and to list what types they have under them, or what types can contain them, and maybe group them by type. I think I'll make a separate WIP table in my userspace so I don't mess up yours, because I'm not 100% clear on what I want it to look like. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 13:59, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ::Basically, yes. I like that "File types" page, I just would like the descriptions to be a bit longer and to list what types they have under them, or what types can contain them, and maybe group them by type. I think I'll make a separate WIP table in my userspace so I don't mess up yours, because I'm not 100% clear on what I want it to look like. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 13:59, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
::Okay, it can use some nicer formatting, but if you look at my [[User:Iritscen/TestSpace|TestSpace]], you'll see what I had in mind. It's similar to your XML File types page, just organized by category, and with "parent" and "child" anchor links to the related types on the same page. Probably it can also contain your colored documentation dots and the types can link to their XML: pages instead of OBD:, at least if this replaces your File types page. Any suggestions? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2013 (CEST) | ::Okay, it can use some nicer formatting, but if you look at my [[User:Iritscen/TestSpace|TestSpace]], you'll see what I had in mind. It's similar to your XML File types page, just organized by category, and with "parent" and "child" anchor links to the related types on the same page. Probably it can also contain your colored documentation dots and the types can link to their XML: pages instead of OBD:, at least if this replaces your File types page. Any suggestions? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
Caution, the header template on pages like [[XML:BINA/OBJC/CHAR]] link to "other BINA" and "other OBJC" ([[XML:File_types]]) in analogy to [[OBD:BINA/OBJC]] and [[OBD:BINA]]. | |||
I like how you structure the descriptions, I'm just a bit unhappy with the index thing because of the mentioned template header. | |||
As a compromise perhaps make 3 type indices so that the template can still link to those. | |||
:Type index: BINA | |||
:* [...] | |||
:Type index: CJBO | |||
:* [...] | |||
:Type index: other files | |||
:* [...] | |||
:Add color dots and links and I totally agree with replacing current file types page with this second version. :) --[[User:Paradox-01|paradox-01]] ([[User talk:Paradox-01|talk]]) 22:43, 19 April 2013 (CEST) | |||
==Your Red Links== | ==Your Red Links== | ||