Jump to content

Bertram Navarre: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
m (added value: 2013, cell conversion)
mNo edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
** In 2012 a mouse spine was [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223498 repaired] with iPSC.
** In 2012 a mouse spine was [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22223498 repaired] with iPSC.


* In 2013 [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130110121020.htm direct cell type conversion] has been demonstrated and this even without viral vectors.
* In 2013 [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130110121020.htm direct cell type conversion] has been demonstrated without the need of viral vectors.
** So for the year 2032 it seems totally possible to regenerate spinal damages in humans. With that in mind, Bertram Navarre depicts a very believable speculation about future's technology.
** So for the year 2032 it seems totally possible to regenerate spinal damages in humans. With that in mind, Bertram Navarre depicts a very believable speculation about future's technology.


8,144

edits