8,013
edits
Bertram Navarre: Difference between revisions
m
2017 update: RL vs. Oni - who will triumph in the race for programmable stem cells?
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Paradox-01 (talk | contribs) m (2017 update: RL vs. Oni - who will triumph in the race for programmable stem cells?) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* In 2013 another [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130110121020.htm direct cell type conversion] was demonstrated whereby only one type of protein needed to get repressed. That's good news because methods based on viral vectors, plasmids and RNA can alter the genome in an unintentional way or have other problematic side effects. | * In 2013 another [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130110121020.htm direct cell type conversion] was demonstrated whereby only one type of protein needed to get repressed. That's good news because methods based on viral vectors, plasmids and RNA can alter the genome in an unintentional way or have other problematic side effects. | ||
* | |||
* In 2017 [https://phys.org/news/2017-06-two-part-stem-cells.html control of plasmids] (ring-shaped bacterial genomes) has been improved. With it normal stem cells have been reliable differentiated. As soon as this can be achieved with iPSC, tissue engineering should get a boost resulting in myriads of applications. For unhealable diseases you can expect that they will cut out the tissue and replace it with a printed chunk. | |||
For the year 2032 it seems totally possible to regenerate spinal damages in humans. With that in mind, Bertram Navarre depicts a very believable speculation about future's technology. | |||