Jump to content

Oni2 talk:Grand Unified Theory: Difference between revisions

m
+cat
m (link fix)
m (+cat)
Line 34: Line 34:
::In the wiki context, I thought interlinked "nodes" could work fine (like Oni2:Node0, Oni2:Node1, etc), but only if we have some special wiki plugin that analyzes links in a given namespace and creates a chart from them, like [https://flowchartwiki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Special_CheckFchw.html FlowChartWiki] -- it is not very appealing visually, so probably not a good idea. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 23:47, 9 June 2020 (CEST)
::In the wiki context, I thought interlinked "nodes" could work fine (like Oni2:Node0, Oni2:Node1, etc), but only if we have some special wiki plugin that analyzes links in a given namespace and creates a chart from them, like [https://flowchartwiki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Special_CheckFchw.html FlowChartWiki] -- it is not very appealing visually, so probably not a good idea. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 23:47, 9 June 2020 (CEST)
::I think if we're trying to agree on a common denominator, then such a graph shouldn't really aim to include lots of conflicting events from different theories. There will be ''some'' variants at some point, but mostly we should see a "core graph" that everyone agrees on, and ideally the consensus will grow, with differences only in minor details. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 23:47, 9 June 2020 (CEST)
::I think if we're trying to agree on a common denominator, then such a graph shouldn't really aim to include lots of conflicting events from different theories. There will be ''some'' variants at some point, but mostly we should see a "core graph" that everyone agrees on, and ideally the consensus will grow, with differences only in minor details. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] ([[User talk:Geyser|talk]]) 23:47, 9 June 2020 (CEST)
[[Category:Oni 2]]