Jump to content

User talk:Mai X: Difference between revisions

→‎OBD updates: new section
No edit summary
(→‎OBD updates: new section)
Line 50: Line 50:


:::Okay, so starting at the same age as me then :-) I've been lucky; I've lost HDs but never any data that wasn't in another place too. These days I have redundant backups of all my data on local HDs and in the cloud. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 22:28, 30 March 2023 (CEST)
:::Okay, so starting at the same age as me then :-) I've been lucky; I've lost HDs but never any data that wasn't in another place too. These days I have redundant backups of all my data on local HDs and in the cloud. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 22:28, 30 March 2023 (CEST)
== OBD updates ==
Thanks for your work on those pages, you've made some good edits! I was surprised to see so many mistaken inclusions of 0xDEAD space at the ends of types, and had to investigate. It looks like confusion sometimes slipped in during the process of editing a page. For instance [[Special:Permalink/4457|this revision]] of ONCV listed the final bytes starting at 0x4C as 32-byte alignment filler, but the next edit by Ssg wiped out geyser's description and simply called them "unused". Perhaps Ssg and other editors knew what they were, but no editors thought to write "alignment padding" instead of "unused" for that range, which is misleading for the reader.
Anyway, I just have one question: are you planning to fill in those offsets where you added a new field but placed "----" for the address? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] ([[User talk:Iritscen|talk]]) 19:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)