Talk:Crescent Moon Kick: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(can you tell I am trying to learn wiki markup by experimentation?) |
(pragmatism not idealism) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of [[Gameplay]], too. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET) | ::And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of [[Gameplay]], too. --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET) | ||
:::<big><sup>↑</sup></big>This is true. I actually just want consistency; using subpages was never a habit of mine until I saw how frequently they were used here. I really am a Boolean kind of person, as I would rather see (virtually) no subpages, or else subpages everywhere, organizing everything. So I was proposing something in line with the fact that most pages are already subpages. Oh well. I will create other move pages without hierarchy, then. We can decide what to do with them later; maybe just unify them under one category. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 16:46, 21 March 2008 (CET) | :::<big><sup>↑</sup></big>This is true. I actually just want consistency; using subpages was never a habit of mine until I saw how frequently they were used here. I really am a Boolean kind of person, as I would rather see (virtually) no subpages, or else subpages everywhere, organizing everything. So I was proposing something in line with the fact that most pages are already subpages. Oh well. I will create other move pages without hierarchy, then. We can decide what to do with them later; maybe just unify them under one category. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 16:46, 21 March 2008 (CET) | ||
:The wiki is not as tidy as Wikipedia, granted. But please try not to be "a Boolean kind of person" if you don't want to be part of the problem ^_^ Letting personal preferences guide the design of a single page is OK, but seeking out stuff to "consistencize" wiki-wide... that's borderline obsessive-compulsive. | |||
:Sorry for the rant, and BTW, yeah, pages at root level and categories FTW. The lack of a standardized/systematic layout encourages casual contribution. If you set up a big-ass frame for new content with lots of strict-ass guidelines there's a good chance you'll be the only one who'll be willing to play along... | |||
:That's the way it's been with all the systematic databases so far. When I set them up in a highly organized way, I know I can't really rely on a timely "group effort", and that I should be ready to wrap up the thing all by myself, and within a very short time frame. Such a scope helps keep my commitments modest. | |||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET) |
Revision as of 17:30, 21 March 2008
geyser, are you sure we shouldn't be putting the move pages under Gameplay/Combat moves? --Iritscen 15:50, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- I think named moves will be just fine on a global level. We can always move them Later(TM). --geyser 16:03, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of Gameplay, too. --geyser 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- ↑This is true. I actually just want consistency; using subpages was never a habit of mine until I saw how frequently they were used here. I really am a Boolean kind of person, as I would rather see (virtually) no subpages, or else subpages everywhere, organizing everything. So I was proposing something in line with the fact that most pages are already subpages. Oh well. I will create other move pages without hierarchy, then. We can decide what to do with them later; maybe just unify them under one category. --Iritscen 16:46, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- And to think of it, the combat move database hardly fits as a subpage of Gameplay, too. --geyser 16:09, 21 March 2008 (CET)
- The wiki is not as tidy as Wikipedia, granted. But please try not to be "a Boolean kind of person" if you don't want to be part of the problem ^_^ Letting personal preferences guide the design of a single page is OK, but seeking out stuff to "consistencize" wiki-wide... that's borderline obsessive-compulsive.
- Sorry for the rant, and BTW, yeah, pages at root level and categories FTW. The lack of a standardized/systematic layout encourages casual contribution. If you set up a big-ass frame for new content with lots of strict-ass guidelines there's a good chance you'll be the only one who'll be willing to play along...
- That's the way it's been with all the systematic databases so far. When I set them up in a highly organized way, I know I can't really rely on a timely "group effort", and that I should be ready to wrap up the thing all by myself, and within a very short time frame. Such a scope helps keep my commitments modest.
- geyser 18:30, 21 March 2008 (CET)