Category talk:Fly-in portraits: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (advice) |
(if you can somehow justify this, I will heed your words, but I need more convincing) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Rather | Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST) | ||
:I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 7 October 2008
Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --geyser 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)
- I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --Iritscen 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST)