19,584
edits
AE:Trailer: Difference between revisions
→New content: my simple solution
(→New content: whaddya think?) |
(→New content: my simple solution) |
||
| Line 237: | Line 237: | ||
:::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rErY_BwwLw Dilemma?] --'''Dox''' | :::::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rErY_BwwLw Dilemma?] --'''Dox''' | ||
::::::Yeah. The problem is that if the Countach explodes without a trace (except for some decals and debris, maybe), then there's no clear reason why any part of the curtain wall should remain standing, or at least why it should remain twisted inwards. If the car travels far inside the lobby before exploding, that could look OK, but eventually I think the only decent-looking way will be to keep the car, as a burning wreck. Sadly, this would need some good modeling/texturing/animating work, so that's not about to happen. This doesn't change the trailer scene anyway: the Countach should be larger, meaner, and with some kind of ramming device instead of the blades... Hmmmmmmmm... Maybe the Countach could be pushing the van around? too weird? I hope that doesn't mean I'm running out of inspiration... ^_^ --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 03:54, 19 August 2008 (CEST) | ::::::Yeah. The problem is that if the Countach explodes without a trace (except for some decals and debris, maybe), then there's no clear reason why any part of the curtain wall should remain standing, or at least why it should remain twisted inwards. If the car travels far inside the lobby before exploding, that could look OK, but eventually I think the only decent-looking way will be to keep the car, as a burning wreck. Sadly, this would need some good modeling/texturing/animating work, so that's not about to happen. This doesn't change the trailer scene anyway: the Countach should be larger, meaner, and with some kind of ramming device instead of the blades... Hmmmmmmmm... Maybe the Countach could be pushing the van around? too weird? I hope that doesn't mean I'm running out of inspiration... ^_^ --[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 03:54, 19 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
:::::::Speaking purely from a point of logic, not feasability, I doubt the Countach is heavy and large enough to make a hole for the assault van with or without a ramming attachment (which would weigh down the front of the car and make it undriveable), meaning it either has to fire a rocket or use the tried-and-true kamikaze method. If it fires a rocket, what's the point? They might as well fire that from the van (it'd be a lot easier). So the Countach-bomb is the only thing that makes sense if we're definitely going to use that model here. | |||
:::::::I am confused as to why you don't want to have the car explode on impact. The curtain wall can't go down once the primary wall is all warped like that, thus leaving the way open for the van. Am I missing something? --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 22:35, 19 August 2008 (CEST) | |||
*weapons again | *weapons again | ||
*HD Griffin (e.g. in a {{C|14}}, with a manual cam closeup on his arrival in the helicopter) | *HD Griffin (e.g. in a {{C|14}}, with a manual cam closeup on his arrival in the helicopter) | ||