Category talk:Fly-in portraits: Difference between revisions

Category talk:Fly-in portraits (view source)

645 bytes added , 7 October 2008

if you can somehow justify this, I will heed your words, but I need more convincing

18,700

edits

Revision as of 02:30, 7 October 2008 (view source) Geyser (talk \| contribs) m (advice)		Revision as of 15:48, 7 October 2008 (view source) Iritscen (talk \| contribs) (if you can somehow justify this, I will heed your words, but I need more convincing) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Rather ~~tan~~ categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)		Rather than categorizing the crappy JPGs, maybe upload PNG versions and categorize those... --[[User:Geyser\|geyser]] 04:30, 7 October 2008 (CEST)
			:I personally don't see any problems in these JPEGs, which is amusing since I was the MPEG-is-crappy guy back during the trailer work when no one else minded the quality of the footage that was being uploaded. I have to say, though, that I don't see the value in uploading 60 images one at a time (stupid wiki software with no batch upload) when they are this tiny and there is such a negligible difference in quality from what we already have. I mean, we have a ton of large art on this wiki in JPEG format that looks great; why do these little things need to be in a lossless format? --[[User:Iritscen\|Iritscen]] 17:48, 7 October 2008 (CEST)