5,391
edits
m (→Daodan latency: perhaps I got carried away and some of the explanation should be moved to "Added value") |
m (→Daodan latency: typos and such) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
;(tentative explanation) | ;(tentative explanation) | ||
Apparently the notion of "latency" is closer to [[wp:virus latency]] (i.e. the attribute of a dormant, inactive state, and the opposite of "patency"), rather than the more common usage where "latency" means delay or lag (that's the meaning it has in engineering and telecommunications). In Oni, a "latent" Chrysalis is ''not'' one that runs out of "bandwidth/framerate" and therefore starts lagging and glitching. Instead the figures of 27.1 and 29 quoted by the scientists correspond to a kind of "inverse scale" | Apparently the notion of "latency" is closer to [[wp:virus latency]] (i.e. the attribute of a dormant, inactive state, and the opposite of "patency"), rather than the more common usage where "latency" means delay or lag (that's the meaning it has in engineering and telecommunications). In Oni, a "latent" Chrysalis is ''not'' one that runs out of "bandwidth"/"framerate" and therefore starts lagging and glitching. Instead the figures of 27.1 and 29 quoted by the scientists correspond to a kind of "inverse scale": more like an "anomaly level", and a "distance to full latency", than a measure of latency itself. | ||
In other words, latency can be seen as a "zero state". A "latent" Konoko is one whose Chrysalis lays low and doesn't manifest itself. It is natural to describe these "calm" situations with a low range of values, and reserve high values for a dangerous/uncharted range. However, the | In other words, latency can be seen as a "zero state". A "fully latent" Konoko is one whose Chrysalis lays low and doesn't manifest itself. It is natural to describe these "calm" situations with a low range of values, and reserve high values for a dangerous/uncharted range. However, the phenomenon, and the quantity describing it, is still called "latency", because the "other end" is completely non-descript and ominous (we have no way of knowing what a "fully non-latent" Chrysalis is like and, you know what, let's not even think about it). | ||
So, somewhat counter-intuitively, a ''higher'' latency figure quoted by the sci-goons corresponds to a ''less latent'' Chrysalis, that manifests itself ''more'' (well, slightly more than not at all). And a ''lower'' latency figure corresponds to a Chrysalis/host symbiosis that is ''more latent'', i.e., closer to the "zero state" | So, somewhat counter-intuitively, a ''higher'' latency figure quoted by the sci-goons corresponds to a ''less latent'' Chrysalis, that manifests itself ''more'' (well, slightly more than not at all). And a ''lower'' latency figure corresponds to a Chrysalis/host symbiosis that is ''more latent'', i.e., closer to the "zero state" represented by "full latency". | ||
Alternative names for this "inverse latency" scale could be "anomaly", "manifestness", "patency", ... Rampancy? oh wait, that one is already taken. | Alternative names for this "inverse latency" scale could be "anomaly", "manifestness", "patency", ... Rampancy? oh wait, that one is already taken. |