Jump to content

User talk:Ssg: Difference between revisions

4,660 bytes added ,  15 November 2006
m
comments
No edit summary
m (comments)
Line 43: Line 43:
|align=right|[[User:80.78.168.2|80.78.168.2]] 19:45, 9 November 2006 (CET)
|align=right|[[User:80.78.168.2|80.78.168.2]] 19:45, 9 November 2006 (CET)
|}
|}
----
----
Hm, things went faster than I thought. Some of your concerns/"threats" I didn't address [[Current events|HERE]].
I'm glad you didn't actually "kick out" the "overview @ Onistuff" and the "struct def for OUP"... ^^
But I ''really'' wish you held your horses with the wiki-based image business : as in "do we need this"?
That said, I'm positively impressed by your dedication and active contribution. Happy, even ^^
;Editing
:Please log in unless you absolutely can't do so. You're gonna make me learn your IP by heart... ^^
;Tables
:The "File" in "OBD File Header" (or "... Footer") was for disambiguation from
::"OBD BINA Header", "OBD OBJC Header", "OBD OSBD Header" and maybe others...
:Since your table will be used for generic binary chunks, regardless of where they belongs to,
::I'd call your new template "OBD Table", as suggested earlier.
;Tables too
:If you ask me, there's nothing ''very'' wrong with a light brown background.
::Or with a white one, for that matter. Matches the default skin just fine. ^^
:::Anyway, I'm colorblind, so I'll let you handle those matters as you see fit.
:An "End" column is not needed. I'm not sure I'd call the first column "Start", but it's OK.
::Actually, I wouldn't integrate the column headers (or their sizes) into the template at all.
:::Because in specific cases, you may want to organize the data somewhat differently
::::(e.g. [[OBD:BINA|HERE]] or [[OBD:TRAM/raw0x34|HERE]] or [[OBD:ONCC#0x15C_-_0x293|HERE]]) (it's messy, but you get the idea)
:The 100% width can be cancelled out by embedding the "OBD File Table" in another set of table tags
::Custom alignment of small tables can be handled there, too.
:::Headers and column sizes can't be overridden that way, though.
:I think a good compromise would be to split the "OBD File Table" in two :
:*the first half including the table tags (fancy backgeound color, 100%, etc). We'd call it "Fancy Table" because it has nothing to do with OBD.
:*the second half would be the header row, with its own fancy color, the column header names and their sizes. We'd call "Fancy OBD Header"
:Additionally, we can have a third template that just creates a row of "header" color, but doesn't specify column names and sizes. We'd call it "Fancy Header"
:By combining "Fancy Table" with either "Fancy OBD Header" or "Fancy Header", you'll be able to get :
:*the "predefined" format for documenting generic chunks of binary data
:*or a more "loose" (not OBD-specific) format where you'll be able to set up custom columns
:You can even use several "Fancy Header"s per table if you so wish
:We may also have such a "fancy row" template for the "Below follows the first package" (which is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleonasm#Semantic_pleonasm semantic pleonasm] BTW), probably with custom text.
;Images:
:Thumbnailing : I ''know'' images don't get thumbnailed by default (duh)
::The appearance on the article page will be ''exactly'' the same as with a URL
::And that's exactly my problem : ''no one'' will ''ever'' want to thumbnail them
::(or right-align them, or resize them, or do any fancy wiki-image stuff with them)
::The only advantages are then :
::*a shorter location to type
:::(but it's not like you type those links in often)
::::(the image is featured on a single page and that's all)
::*the ability for dedicated users to provide alternative snapshots
:::(but they can do it just fine by linking to remote images)
::::(or, better, to images stored on their oni2.net accounts)
::*the permanent presence of the image at that location and on oni2.net
:::(again, the more dedicated people get an account on oni2.net, the better)
::::(in your case, is there a good reason for not mirroring stuff on ssg.oni2.net?)
:::::(if not for the whole site, at least the images...)
::The inability to rename the images, and the lousy short-term flexibility (e.g., splitting/merging snapshots)
:::are IMO ''major drawbacks'' of wiki-based images as compared to external URLs.
::::(in this specific case) (and so I'd really ask you to think it over again)
:Another "problem" (if you insist on having the images wiki-based) is with the format and filenames :
::Make it PNG rather than GIF
::Capitalize the names according to the names of the actual files
;Images Too
:Whatever your "OBD Image" template is supposed to do, it's probably a bad idea. ^^
:Don't center images, or embed them in a table spanning the whole page.
:Please don't. Or at least say what's wrong with plain old left-aligned images
::(external ones ^^ )
:More generally, always think in terms of "what was wrong with the old stuff?"
[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 18:49, 15 November 2006 (CET)