Jump to content

User talk:Geyser: Difference between revisions

m
m (oh...)
Line 544: Line 544:




Well, I've checked the history:
:Well, I've checked the history:
 
::1st edit: fixed spelling mistakes
 
::2nd edit: fixed spelling mistakes + added formula
1st edit: fixed spelling mistakes
::3rd edit: added link (I didn't watch the pic) + deleted formula
 
::4th edit: deleted link
2nd edit: fixed spelling mistakes + added formula
:The last edit was clean. After your "rollback" the mistakes are there again. That's why I asked.
 
::[[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 23:07, 10 September 2007 (CEST)
3rd edit: added link (I didn't watch the pic) + deleted formula
:Rollbacks undo all edits by a user in a row, unlike manual reverts.
 
::In this case, it was IMO appropriate to revert all four edits.
4th edit: deleted link
:*There's the image, of course. The image was already enough.
 
:*The "formula" was nothing like a real formula. Plain weird.
 
:*The "fixed spelling" introduced a number of new mistakes (!)
The last edit was clean. After your "rollback" the mistakes are there again. That's why I asked. [[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 23:07, 10 September 2007 (CEST)
::Therefore I think it was just a (bad) spellchecker routine.
:It is not critical to fix the spelling of RS pages,
::because they'll be translated in-place anyway.
:Voilà.
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 02:09, 11 September 2007 (CEST)