5,389
edits
m (→Sorry?: answer) |
m (i hate arguing ^_^) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 14:44, 25 September 2007 (CEST) | ::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 14:44, 25 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
:"They are irrelevant here." Are you kiddin'? | |||
:"Maybe the wiki's main navigation and other toolbars are centered? No they're not." | |||
:Gosh, geyser, that's not the point. | |||
:Yeah, they're not centered, they're on the left. But they're always there. That's the point. | |||
:Have you ever tried to use a navigation that always jumps from one place to another? Such a navigation is just useless. | |||
:I don't mind where the navigation is placed as long as they're all in the same place. | |||
::[[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 16:07, 25 September 2007 (CEST) | |||
:Point taken. Be careful not to flame anything or anyone: it's all work-in-progress. | |||
:Neo objected to having to scroll downwards to see actual page content, so I reacted. | |||
:Actually, I ''did'' design the header with two alignments in mind: right and center. | |||
:I prefer a right-aligned header most of the time, but sometimes centered is OK. | |||
:It don't see it as "jumping" from one place to another. Not if you take OBD as a ''user''. | |||
:However, one point about full-featured navigation is that it's completely useless. | |||
:If people open an OBD page, usually they haven't come to look at the navigation... | |||
:So I'll basically swap the header and footer and make the new header even lighter. | |||
:If you don't mind a different layout, please don't overreact to related tests ^_^ | |||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 16:29, 25 September 2007 (CEST) | |||
[[User: |