OBD talk:BINA/PAR3: Difference between revisions

OBD talk:BINA/PAR3 (view source)

449 bytes added , 7 December 2007

m

now why would they use .999 instead of 1?

5,389

edits

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 [[User:Ssg|Ssg]] 12:20, 7 December 2007 (CET)
+:@ Neo & WIMC: "The interval for r is [-0.999, 0.999]"
+:That's odd because then the interval for x is [0, 9.99],
+:meaning that they leave out 0.1% of the inverse table
+:(i.e., they will sample only 99% of the last interval)
+:The only reason why they'd do this is to avoid i=10...
+:Anyway, this affects the final distribution very little.
+:Instead of a cutoff at 98% they have 97.902%: big deal.
+::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 18:04, 7 December 2007 (CET)