5,389
edits
Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
m
→Vote Canceled: in Soviet Russia, wiki edits YOU!!!
m (→2nd Vote For New Main Page: editing links) |
m (→Vote Canceled: in Soviet Russia, wiki edits YOU!!!) |
||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
===Vote Canceled=== | ===Vote Canceled=== | ||
At the risk of sounding bitchy... you guys really got off track here. You're talking about spam (where?), and portals, and forgetting to sign so I have no idea who's saying what. Now geyser has introduced a new main page in the middle of the vote, so the vote has been totally derailed. This means everyone's vote is now obsolete, because it may or may not have been made after seeing geyser's new page. *sigh* If we're going to try this democratic thing properly, we need everyone to please vote again in the next section. It's not my fault. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 18:44, 4 February 2008 (CET) | :At the risk of sounding bitchy... you guys really got off track here. You're talking about spam (where?), and portals, and forgetting to sign so I have no idea who's saying what. Now geyser has introduced a new main page in the middle of the vote, so the vote has been totally derailed. This means everyone's vote is now obsolete, because it may or may not have been made after seeing geyser's new page. *sigh* If we're going to try this democratic thing properly, we need everyone to please vote again in the next section. It's not my fault. --[[User:Iritscen|Iritscen]] 18:44, 4 February 2008 (CET) | ||
:I'm sorry I spoiled your vote (perhaps intentionally: I'm a dictator after all, albeit an enlightened one). Note, however, that every single person either signed or logged in. | |||
:You could thus always get an idea of who's talking, with a quick look at the history. BTW, the recent spam would also appear there, as it was plaguing this very page. | |||
:You shouldn't overestimate the democratic aspects of wikis. Just because Wikipedia does things a certain way doesn't mean we should mimic them: not at all... | |||
:All those encyclopedic standards, for example, are completely irrelevant to a project wiki, which should just be decently informative to its supposed visitors, period. | |||
:I also think it's quite appropriate not to enforce scholarly objectivity in the articles. As long as "personal essays" and occasional wacky stuff do their job, let them be. | |||
:Bring in organization if you like, but spare us the tedious bits. In other words: take the "fun" out of "functionality", and I might buy myself some extra guts, my [[friend]] ^_^ | |||
::[[User:Geyser|geyser]] 23:09, 4 February 2008 (CET) | |||
==2nd Vote For New Main Page== | ==2nd Vote For New Main Page== | ||